ArticlePloS one2020
A rank-based normalization method with the fully adjusted full-stage procedure in genetic association studies.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-diagnostic plasma inflammatory proteins and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in three population-based cohort studies from the United States and the United Kingdom.International journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Important Haplotypes and Candidate GeneAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Epistatic Network Analyses of Semantic Fluency in Older Adults.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in crop research.Journal of applied genetics · 2024Review
- Transcriptomic pan-cancer analysis using rank-based Bayesian inference.Molecular oncology · 2023Article
- Loci for insulin processing and secretion provide insight into type 2 diabetes risk.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- sumSTAAR: A flexible framework for gene-based association studies using GWAS summary statistics.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- The effect of heteroscedasticity on the prediction efficiency of genome-wide polygenic score for body mass index.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Visceral adiposity is associated with metabolic profiles predictive of type 2 diabetes and myocardial infarction.Communications medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the area of genetic epidemiology, studies of the genotype-phenotype associations have made significant contributions to human complicated trait genetics. These studies depend on specialized statistical methods for uncover the association between traits and genetic variants, both common and rare variants. Often, in analyzing such studies, potentially confounding factors, such as social and environmental conditions, are required to be involved. Multiple linear regression is the most widely used type of regression analysis when the outcome of interest is quantitative traits. Many statistical tests for identifying genotype-phenotype associations using linear regression rely on the assumption that the traits (or the residuals) of the regression follow a normal distribution. In genomic research, the rank-based inverse normal transformation (INT) is one of the most popular approaches to reach normally distributed traits (or normally distributed residuals). Many researchers believe that applying the INT to the non-normality of the traits (or the non-normality of the residuals) is required for valid inference, because the phenotypic (or residual) outliers and non-normality have the significant influence on both the type I error rate control and statistical power, especially under the situation in rare-variant association testing procedures. Here we propose a test for exploring the association of the rare variant with the quantitative trait by using a fully adjusted full-stage INT. Using simulations we show that the fully adjusted full-stage INT is more appropriate than the existing INT methods, such as the fully adjusted two-stage INT and the INT-based omnibus test, in testing genotype-phenotype associations with rare variants, especially when genotypes are uncorrelated with covariates. The fully adjusted full-stage INT retains the advantages of the fully adjusted two-stage INT and ameliorates the problems of the fully adjusted two-stage INT for analysis of rare variants under non-normality of the trait. We also present theoretical results on these desirable properties. In addition, the two available methods with non-normal traits, the quantile/median regression method and the Yeo-Johnson power transformation, are also included in simulations for comparison with these desirable properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.