Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32559135›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2020

Acute and chronic sympathomimetic effects of e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette smoking: role of nicotine and non-nicotine constituents.

Sara Arastoo, Kacey P Haptonstall, Yasmine Choroomi, Roya Moheimani, Kevin Nguyen, Elizabeth Tran, Jeffrey Gornbein, Holly R Middlekauff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara ArastooDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Kacey P HaptonstallDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Yasmine ChoroomiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Roya MoheimaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Kevin NguyenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8327-268X
Elizabeth TranDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Jeffrey GornbeinDepartments of Medicine and Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Holly R MiddlekauffDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) and tobacco cigarettes (TCs) both release nicotine, a sympathomimetic drug. We hypothesized that baseline heart rate variability (HRV) and hemodynamics would be similar in chronic EC and TC smokers and that after acute EC use, changes in HRV and hemodynamics would be attributable to nicotine, not non-nicotine, constituents in EC aerosol. In 100 smokers, including 58 chronic EC users and 42 TC smokers, baseline HRV and hemodynamics [blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR)] were compared. To isolate the acute effects of nicotine vs. non-nicotine constituents in EC aerosol, we compared changes in HRV, BP, and HR in EC users after using an EC with nicotine (ECN), EC without nicotine (EC0), nicotine inhaler (NI), or sham vaping (control). Outcomes were also compared with TC smokers after smoking one TC. Baseline HRV and hemodynamics were not different in chronic EC users and TC smokers. In EC users, BP and HR, but not HRV outcomes, increased only after using the ECN, consistent with a nicotine effect on BP and HR. Similarly, in TC smokers, BP and HR but not HRV outcomes increased after smoking one TC. Despite a similar increase in nicotine, the hemodynamic increases were significantly greater after TC smokers smoked one TC compared with the increases after EC users used the ECN. In conclusion, chronic EC and TC smokers exhibit a similar pattern of baseline HRV. Acute increases in BP and HR in EC users are attributable to nicotine, not non-nicotine, constituents in EC aerosol. The greater acute pressor effects after TC compared with ECN may be attributable to non-nicotine, combusted constituents in TC smoke.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdultAerosolsBlood PressureCardiovascular SystemCigarette SmokingCross-Over StudiesFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansInhalation ExposureMaleMiddle AgedNicotineNicotinic AgonistsAerosolsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsSympathomimeticsblood pressureelectronic cigarettesheart rate variabilitynicotinetobacco cigarettes

Identifiers

PMID32559135
PMCPMC7473924
OpenAlexW3036009875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.