ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2020
Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Artificial Intelligence Dose Engine for Fast Carbon Ion Treatment Planning.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Generalizability of deep learning-based dose conversion model in proton beam therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Geometry-encoded deep learning (GeoDL) framework for real-time 3D dose verification for online adaptive radiotherapy.Machine learning. Health · 2025Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Theranostics Dosimetry for Cancer Therapy: a Review.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Improvement of deep learning-based dose conversion accuracy to a Monte Carlo algorithm in proton beam therapy for head and neck cancers.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- Improving VMAT dose calculation accuracy and planning quality via a GPU-accelerated Fourier transform dose calculation algorithm.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for response prediction and personalisation in radiation oncology.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Review
- A deep learning model to predict dose distributions for breast cancer radiotherapy.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The impact of intravenous iodinated contrast agents on radiotherapy dose calculation and radiobiological effect predictions in central lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy: a secondary dose verification model with geometry-encoded U-Net.Machine learning: science and technology · 2024Article
- Application and progress of artificial intelligence in radiation therapy dose prediction.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Review
- A generalization performance study on the boosting radiotherapy dose calculation engine based on super-resolution.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Advancing equitable and personalized cancer care: Novel applications and priorities of artificial intelligence for fairness and inclusivity in the patient care workflow.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2024Review
- A convolutional neural network model for EPID-based non-transit dosimetry.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Sub-second photon dose prediction via transformer neural networks.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Tissues margin-based analytical anisotropic algorithm boosting method via deep learning attention mechanism with cervical cancer.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- A deep-learning-based dose verification tool utilizing fluence maps for a cobalt-60 compensator-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy system.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Advances in Automated Treatment Planning.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2022Review
- A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In radiotherapy, a trade-off exists between computational workload/speed and dose calculation accuracy. Calculation methods like pencil-beam convolution can be much faster than Monte-Carlo methods, but less accurate. The dose difference, mostly caused by inhomogeneities and electronic disequilibrium, is highly correlated with the dose distribution and the underlying anatomical tissue density. We hypothesize that a conversion scheme can be established to boost low-accuracy doses to high-accuracy, using intensity information obtained from computed tomography (CT) images. A deep learning-driven framework was developed to test the hypothesis by converting between two commercially available dose calculation methods: Anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB). A hierarchically dense U-Net model was developed to boost the accuracy of AAA dose toward the AXB level. The network contained multiple layers of varying feature sizes to learn their dose differences, in relationship to CT, both locally and globally. Anisotropic analytic algorithm and AXB doses were calculated in pairs for 120 lung radiotherapy plans covering various treatment techniques, beam energies, tumor locations, and dose levels. For each case, the CT and the AAA dose were used as the input and the AXB dose as the "ground-truth" output, to train and test the model. The mean squared errors (MSEs) and gamma passing rates (2 mm/2% & 1 mm/1%) were calculated between the boosted AAA doses and the "ground-truth" AXB doses. The boosted AAA doses demonstrated substantially improved match to the "ground-truth" AXB doses, with average (± s.d.) gamma passing rate (1 mm/1%) 97.6% (±2.4%) compared to 87.8% (±9.0%) of the original AAA doses. The corresponding average MSE was 0.11(±0.05) vs 0.31(±0.21). Deep learning is able to capture the differences between dose calculation algorithms to boost the low-accuracy algorithms. By combining a less accurate dose calculation algorithm with a trained deep learning model, dose calculation can potentially achieve both high accuracy and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.