Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32558877›Full record

ArticleJAMA2020

Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use With COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality.

Emil L Fosbøl, Jawad H Butt, Lauge Østergaard, Charlotte Andersson, Christian Selmer, Kristian Kragholm, Morten Schou, Matthew Phelps, Gunnar H Gislason, Thomas A Gerds and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 243 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
243citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

243 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 389 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

183 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Emil L FosbølThe Heart Center, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jawad H ButtThe Heart Center, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lauge ØstergaardThe Heart Center, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte AnderssonSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christian SelmerDepartment of Endocrinology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristian KragholmDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Morten SchouDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Matthew PhelpsDepartment of Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Research, The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gunnar H GislasonDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Thomas A GerdsDepartment of Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Research, The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Department of Cardiology, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Lars KøberThe Heart Center, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKDanish National Research Foundation · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKBoston University · USFrederiksberg Hospital · DKGentofte Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceIt has been hypothesized that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may make patients more susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to worse outcomes through upregulation of the functional receptor of the virus, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2.

objectiveTo examine whether use of ACEI/ARBs was associated with COVID-19 diagnosis and worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsTo examine outcomes among patients with COVID-19, a retrospective cohort study using data from Danish national administrative registries was conducted. Patients with COVID-19 from February 22 to May 4, 2020, were identified using ICD-10 codes and followed up from day of diagnosis to outcome or end of study period (May 4, 2020). To examine susceptibility to COVID-19, a Cox regression model with a nested case-control framework was used to examine the association between use of ACEI/ARBs vs other antihypertensive drugs and the incidence rate of a COVID-19 diagnosis in a cohort of patients with hypertension from February 1 to May 4, 2020. EXPOSURES: ACEI/ARB use was defined as prescription fillings 6 months prior to the index date. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In the retrospective cohort study, the primary outcome was death, and a secondary outcome was a composite outcome of death or severe COVID-19. In the nested case-control susceptibility analysis, the outcome was COVID-19 diagnosis.

resultsIn the retrospective cohort study, 4480 patients with COVID-19 were included (median age, 54.7 years [interquartile range, 40.9-72.0]; 47.9% men). There were 895 users (20.0%) of ACEI/ARBs and 3585 nonusers (80.0%). In the ACEI/ARB group, 18.1% died within 30 days vs 7.3% in the nonuser group, but this association was not significant after adjustment for age, sex, and medical history (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.03]). Death or severe COVID-19 occurred in 31.9% of ACEI/ARB users vs 14.2% of nonusers by 30 days (adjusted HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89-1.23]). In the nested case-control analysis of COVID-19 susceptibility, 571 patients with COVID-19 and prior hypertension (median age, 73.9 years; 54.3% men) were compared with 5710 age- and sex-matched controls with prior hypertension but not COVID-19. Among those with COVID-19, 86.5% used ACEI/ARBs vs 85.4% of controls; ACEI/ARB use compared with other antihypertensive drugs was not significantly associated with higher incidence of COVID-19 (adjusted HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.80-1.36]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Prior use of ACEI/ARBs was not significantly associated with COVID-19 diagnosis among patients with hypertension or with mortality or severe disease among patients diagnosed as having COVID-19. These findings do not support discontinuation of ACEI/ARB medications that are clinically indicated in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBetacoronavirusCase-Control StudiesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19DenmarkFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID32558877
PMCPMC7305566
OpenAlexW3035819488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.