Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32558828›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2019

Learning to Evaluate Color Similarity for Histopathology Images using Triplet Networks.

Anirudh Choudhary, Hang Wu, Li Tong, May D Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anirudh ChoudharyGeorgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA.
Hang WuGeorgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA.
Li TongGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory University Atlanta, GA.
May D WangGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory University Atlanta, GA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Tissue and Animal UseU54CA119338 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2005 to 2009
$18.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stain normalization is a crucial pre-processing step for histopathological image processing, and can help improve the accuracy of downstream tasks such as segmentation and classification. To evaluate the effectiveness of stain normalization methods, various metrics based on color-perceptual similarity and stain color evaluation have been proposed. However, there still exists a huge gap between metric evaluation and human perception, given the limited explainability power of existing metrics and inability to combine color and semantic information efficiently. Inspired by the effectiveness of deep neural networks in evaluating perceptual similarity of natural images, in this paper, we propose TriNet-P, a color-perceptual similarity metric for whole slide images, based on deep metric embeddings. We evaluate the proposed approach using four publicly available breast cancer histological datasets. The benefit of our approach is its representation efficiency of the perceptual factors associated with H&E stained images with minimal human intervention. We show that our metric can capture the semantic similarities, both at subject (patient) and laboratory levels, and leads to better performance in image retrieval and clustering tasks.

Indexed as

Metric EmbeddingPerceptual SimilarityRepresentation LearningWhole-Slide Imaging

Identifiers

PMID32558828
PMCPMC7302047
OpenAlexW2972814547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.