Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32558314›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental dental research2020

Four-day plaque regrowth evaluation of a peptide chewing gum in a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Brian Kirkwood, Michael Miller, Jeffery Milleman, Kimberly Milleman, Kai Leung

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02864901 (A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Trial of an Antiplaque Chewing Gum), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02864901 phase2completednot on this map

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Trial of an Antiplaque Chewing Gum (30 mg) - Phase 2 Proof of Concept in a Generally Healthy Patient Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorU.S. Army Medical Research and Development CommandRan2016 to 2016Enrolled27ConditionsPlaque RegrowthArmsKSL-W
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian KirkwoodDental and Craniofacial Trauma, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-3101
Michael MillerClinSmart LLC, Newton, Pennsylvania.
Jeffery MillemanSalus Research, Inc., Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Kimberly MillemanSalus Research, Inc., Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Kai LeungDental and Craniofacial Trauma, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, Texas.
Salus (United States) · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USWalmart (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAntimicrobial peptide, KSL-W, formulated as an antiplaque chewing gum (APCG), was tested to evaluate the dental plaque inhibition activity and safety in an IRB approved and FDA regulated 4-day plaque regrowth clinical study.

methodsThis Phase 2 two-armed placebo-controlled, double blind, randomized (1:1), multiple dose, and single-center study was evaluated in a proof of concept for the APCG containing 30 mg antimicrobial peptide KSL-W. Twenty six generally healthy subjects were consented and randomized into the study. The subjects were administered a dose three times per day for four treatment days following a complete dental prophylaxis. Participants were prohibited from conducting oral hygiene care (teeth brushing, flossing, and/or mouth wash rinse) for the duration of the trial. Twelve to 16 hr prior to the baseline visit, the subjects were to abstain from oral hygiene care. The Quigley-Hein Turesky plaque index (QHT) score and the oral soft tissue clinical exams were obtained at both Day 0 and Day 4.

resultsAll randomized study subjects that received either APCG or placebo gum completed the study with no significant adverse events recorded. The APCG significantly inhibited the regrowth of dental plaque over the course of 4 days. The whole mouth data demonstrated a difference in the QHT between the APCG and the placebo gum of 1.14 (SE = 0.27) and 95% confidence bounds of 0.58, 1.70 with a two-tailed P value of .0003.

conclusionConsidering the limited sample size, the proof of concept analysis in this Phase 2 study confirmed that APCG is effective against dental plaque formation and safe for human use. (ClinicalTrials.gov Study ID# NCT02864901).

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Infective AgentsChewing GumDental PlaqueDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePeptide FragmentsPrognosisAnti-Infective AgentsChewing GumPeptide Fragmentsbiofilm(s)drug deliveryoral hygienesalivary antimicrobial proteins

Identifiers

PMID32558314
PMCPMC7301399
OpenAlexW2995940796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.