Trial reportClinical and experimental dental research2020
Four-day plaque regrowth evaluation of a peptide chewing gum in a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02864901 (A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Trial of an Antiplaque Chewing Gum), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Clinical Trial of an Antiplaque Chewing Gum (30 mg) - Phase 2 Proof of Concept in a Generally Healthy Patient Population
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Four-day plaque regrowth evaluation of a peptide chewing gum in a double-blind randomized clinical trial.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2020Trial
- Characteristics and Potential of KSL, KSL-W, and Dadapin-1 Antimicrobial Peptides for Preventing Infections of Orthopedic Prosthetic Devices: Identifying the Most Robust Candidate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Natural Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Synthetic Analogues for Effective Oral Microflora Control and Oral Infection Treatment-The Role of Ceragenins in the Development of New Therapeutic Methods.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Assessing Cytotoxicity, Proteolytic Stability, and Selectivity of Antimicrobial Peptides: Implications for Orthopedic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Delivery of biologics: Topical administration.Biomaterials · 2023Review
- 3D printed scaffold for repairing bone defects in apical periodontitis.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in the Development of Antimicrobial and Antifouling Biocompatible Materials for Dental Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAntimicrobial peptide, KSL-W, formulated as an antiplaque chewing gum (APCG), was tested to evaluate the dental plaque inhibition activity and safety in an IRB approved and FDA regulated 4-day plaque regrowth clinical study.
methodsThis Phase 2 two-armed placebo-controlled, double blind, randomized (1:1), multiple dose, and single-center study was evaluated in a proof of concept for the APCG containing 30 mg antimicrobial peptide KSL-W. Twenty six generally healthy subjects were consented and randomized into the study. The subjects were administered a dose three times per day for four treatment days following a complete dental prophylaxis. Participants were prohibited from conducting oral hygiene care (teeth brushing, flossing, and/or mouth wash rinse) for the duration of the trial. Twelve to 16 hr prior to the baseline visit, the subjects were to abstain from oral hygiene care. The Quigley-Hein Turesky plaque index (QHT) score and the oral soft tissue clinical exams were obtained at both Day 0 and Day 4.
resultsAll randomized study subjects that received either APCG or placebo gum completed the study with no significant adverse events recorded. The APCG significantly inhibited the regrowth of dental plaque over the course of 4 days. The whole mouth data demonstrated a difference in the QHT between the APCG and the placebo gum of 1.14 (SE = 0.27) and 95% confidence bounds of 0.58, 1.70 with a two-tailed P value of .0003.
conclusionConsidering the limited sample size, the proof of concept analysis in this Phase 2 study confirmed that APCG is effective against dental plaque formation and safe for human use. (ClinicalTrials.gov Study ID# NCT02864901).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.