Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32558241›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2021

Measuring aniseikonia tolerance range for stereoacuity - a tool for the refractive surgeon.

Therese Krarup, Ivan Nisted, Hadi Kjaerbo, Ulrik Christensen, Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Morten la Cour

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Changing Natural History of Anisometropia: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Meridional ocular magnification after cataract surgery with toric and non-toric intraocular lenses.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Therese KrarupDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8543-2843
Ivan NistedFaculty of Health, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-4949
Hadi KjaerboScandinavian Eye Center, Hellerup, Denmark.
Ulrik ChristensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jens Folke KiilgaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-1460
Morten la CourDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Glostrup Hospital · DKCentral Denmark Region · DK

Funding

Candys FoundationSynoptik Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNo method exists to measure aniseikonia tolerance in stereoacuity. The brain can compensate for 2%-3% aniseikonia (i.e. 2-3 dioptres of anisometropia) without impairing stereoacuity; however, a substantial proportion of anisometropic patients experience problems caused by disruptions of sensory fusion due to surgically induced aniseikonia. We hypothesized that individual differences in tolerance to aniseikonia exist and sought to develop a method to measure aniseikonia tolerance.

methodsA total of 21 eye-healthy phakic individuals older than 50 years of age and 11 patients awaiting clear lens extraction were included. Patients were tested with best corrected near and distance visual acuity, cover/uncover test, eye dominance test, stereoacuity threshold (TNO test), slit lamp examination and ocular coherence tomography. The stereoacuity threshold was determined with aniseikonia induced by different size lenses ranging from 1% to 9% magnification of both eyes in increments of 1%. The aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR) was defined as the percentage aniseikonia in which the stereoacuity threshold was maintained.

resultsWe examined 32 patients with a median age of 65 (95% CI: 62-66 years), CDVA better than 6/7.5 (0.1 logMAR), and median near visual acuity better than 6/6 (0.0 logMAR). The median stereoacuity threshold was 60 arcsec (maximum 30, minimum 120). We observed large inter-individual differences in ATR: 6/31 (19%) participants had an ATR of ≤1%, 1/31 (3%) had an ATR of 1-5%, 7/31 (22%) had an ATR of 5-10%, and 17/31 (54%) had an ATR of >10%.

conclusionWe present a reliable method for measuring the amount of aniseikonia that a person can tolerate without impairing stereopsis. We report large inter-individual differences in tolerance of aniseikonia.

Indexed as

Refractive Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsVisual AcuityAniseikoniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical CoherenceVision, BinocularVision Testsametropiaaniseikoniaaniseikonia toleranceanisometropiacataract surgeryrule of thumbsize glasses

Identifiers

PMID32558241
PMCPMC7891617
OpenAlexW3036458204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.