Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32558050›Full record

SynthesisJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2020

Non-pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviours of adults with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analysis.

E Bruinsma, B J van den Hoofdakker, A P Groenman, P J Hoekstra, G M de Kuijper, M Klaver, A A de Bildt

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Complex Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Soweto-based community psychiatry clinics.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E BruinsmaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1593-6007
B J van den HoofdakkerUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9570-9976
A P GroenmanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8394-6605
P J HoekstraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7260-4119
G M de KuijperUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5315-2110
M KlaverUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1439-8876
A A de BildtUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4196-2404
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-pharmacological interventions are recommended for the treatment of challenging behaviours in individuals with intellectual disabilities by clinical guidelines. However, evidence for their effectiveness is ambiguous. The aim of the current meta-analysis is to update the existing evidence, to investigate long-term outcome, and to examine whether intervention type, delivery mode, and study design were associated with differences in effectiveness.

methodAn electronic search was conducted using the databases Medline, Eric, PsychINFO and Cinahl. Studies with experimental or quasi-experimental designs were included. We performed an overall random-effect meta-analysis and subgroup analyses.

resultsWe found a significant moderate overall effect of non-pharmacological interventions on challenging behaviours (d = 0.573, 95% CI [0.352-0.795]), and this effect appears to be longlasting. Interventions combining mindfulness and behavioural techniques showed to be more effective than other interventions. However, this result should be interpreted with care due to possible overestimation of the subgroup analysis. No differences in effectiveness were found across assessment times, delivery modes or study designs.

conclusionsNon-pharmacological interventions appear to be moderately effective on the short and long term in reducing challenging behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyMindfulnessOutcome Assessment, Health CareProblem BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedChildHumansIntellectual DisabilityMiddle AgedYoung AdultChallenging behaviourIntellectual disabilitiesMeta-analysisNon-pharmacological interventions

Identifiers

PMID32558050
PMCPMC7384078
OpenAlexW3035857423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.