ArticleHealth & social care in the community2020
Do European co-residential caregivers aged 50+ have an increased risk of frailty?
Article in Health & social care in the community, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined functional strength training and progressive muscle relaxation in informal caregivers of people with dementia: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Impact of spousal caregiving on frailty index: longitudinal evidence from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Age and ageing · 2025Article
- Seizing life with both hands: longitudinal analyses of grip strength among informal caregivers in Europe (SHARE).BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Family Caregiving during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada: A Mediation Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Do European co-residential caregivers aged 50+ have an increased risk of frailty?Health & social care in the community · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One important health challenge associated with ageing is frailty, which has been acknowledged as a new public health priority. However, only a few studies have explored the relationship between providing care at older ages and frailty. The main objective of this study is to assess whether there is an association between providing co-residential care and frailty, according to gender and from a European cross-sectional perspective, among the population aged 50+. Data from 17 European countries that participated in wave 6 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) is used (N = 52,073). Multinomial logistic regressions were used to estimate caregivers' chances of frailty. The results show that the prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty differs according to the caregiver's status, gender and the European region. The highest prevalence of pre-frailty was found in the group of female caregivers from Northern countries (57.3%), and the highest prevalence of frailty was found in the group of female caregivers from Southern countries (29.3%). Providing co-residential care is positively associated with the risk of being pre-frail in women, in all European regions (Northern: OR 1.724, 95% CI 1.190-2.496; Central: OR 1.213, 95% CI 1.010-1.456; Eastern: OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.031-1.460; Southern: OR 1.343, 95% CI 1.103-1.634), and with being frail for both genders in the Southern region (female: OR 1.527, 95% CI 1.060-2.200; male: OR 1.644, 95% CI 1.250-2.164). The results of this study suggest that female co-residential caregivers are a greater risk of being pre-frail in all European regions except Southern Europe, where male and female co-residential caregivers are a greater risk of being frail, compared with non-caregivers. European policy makers should create political measures to prevent and reverse frailty among European co-residential caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.