ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Investigating biases in the measurement of apparent alveolar septal wall thickness with hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Pulmonary Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Regional variations in hyperpolarized 129Xe lung MRI: Insights from CSI-CSSR and CSSR in healthy and irradiated rat models.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Preclinical MRI Using HyperpolarizedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Measuring pulmonary gas exchange using compartment-selective xenon-polarization transfer contrast (XTC) MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- In vivo methods and applications of xenon-129 magnetic resonance.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate biases in the measurement of apparent alveolar septal wall thickness (SWT) with hyperpolarized xenon-129 (HXe) as a function of acquisition parameters.
methodsThe HXe MRI scans with simultaneous gas-phase and dissolved-phase excitation were performed using 1-dimensional projection scans in mechanically ventilated rabbits. The dissolved-phase magnetization was periodically saturated, and the dissolved-phase xenon uptake dynamics were measured at end inspiration and end expiration with temporal resolutions up to 10 ms using a Look-Locker-type acquisition. The apparent alveolar septal wall thickness was extracted by fitting the signal to a theoretical model, and the findings were compared with those from the more commonly use chemical shift saturation recovery MRI spectroscopy technique with several different delay time arrangements.
resultsIt was found that repeated application of RF saturation pulses in chemical shift saturation recovery acquisitions caused exchange-dependent gas-phase saturation that heavily biased the derived SWT value. When this bias was reduced by our proposed method, the SWT dependence on lung inflation disappeared due to an inherent insensitivity of HXe dissolved-phase MRI to thin alveolar structures with very short
conclusionThe apparent SWT measured with HXe MRI was found to be heavily dependent on the acquisition parameters. A method is proposed that can minimize this measurement bias, add limited spatial resolution, and reduce measurement time to a degree that free-breathing studies are feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.