Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32557588›Full record

SynthesisAnaesthesia2021

A systematic review and trial sequential analysis of intravenous vs. oral peri-operative paracetamol.

M Mallama, A Valencia, K Rijs, W J R Rietdijk, M Klimek, J A Calvache

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Paracetamol: A Review of Guideline Recommendations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M MallamaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia.
A ValenciaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia.
K RijsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W J R RietdijkDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M KlimekDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-9929
J A CalvacheDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9421-3717
University of Cauca · COErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

Erasmus Medisch CentrumUniversidad del Cauca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pain might be different after intravenous vs. oral paracetamol. We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials in patients >15 years that compared intravenous with oral paracetamol for postoperative pain. We identified 14 trials with 1695 participants. There was inconclusive evidence for an effect of route of paracetamol administration on postoperative pain at 0-2 h (734 participants), 2-6 h (766 participants), 6-24 h (1115 participants) and >24 h (248 participants), with differences in standardised mean (95%CI) pain scores for intravenous vs. oral of -0.17 (-0.45 to 0.10), -0.09 (-0.24 to 0.06), 0.06 (-0.12 to 0.23) and 0.03 (-0.22 to 0.28), respectively. Trial sequential analyses suggested that a total of 3948 participants would be needed to demonstrate a meaningful difference in pain or its absence at 0-2 h. There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Intravenous paracetamol is more expensive than oral paracetamol. Substitution of oral paracetamol in half the patients given intravenous paracetamol in our hospital would save around £ 38,711 (€ 43,960 or US$ 47,498) per annum.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticHumansPostoperative PainAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-Narcoticacetaminophencost-benefit analysismeta-analysisparacetamolpostoperative painsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32557588
PMCPMC7818191
OpenAlexW3036223323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.