ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2020
Primary Cutaneous Coccidioidomycosis: An Update.
Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid histidine kinases and antifungal warfare in thermal dimorphic fungi.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Review
- A Unique Case of Disseminated Cutaneous Coccidioidomycosis Years After Initial Infection.Cureus · 2025Article
- Disseminated coccidioidomycosis in immunocompetent patients in non-endemic areas: a case series and literature review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022Review
- Locally recurrent primary cutaneous coccidioidomycosis.JAAD case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coccidioidomycosis is an endemic mycosis of the southern United States, Northern Mexico, and South America. Primary cutaneous coccidioidomycosis, despite being a very rare clinical presentation, has shown an increasing incidence. An extensive literature search for cutaneous coccidioidomycosis cases was performed using the OLDMEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, LILACS and Google Scholar databases for studies published from January 1927 through December 21, 2019. Forty-two observational studies were included totaling 82 cases of primary cutaneous coccidioidomycosis. Narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were also included. Additionally, an original case was included. Patients with primary cutaneous coccidioidomycosis share the same geographical and epidemiological characteristics as those with pulmonary or disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Most of the imported cases came from endemic areas. A large portion of cases had prior local skin trauma. Tissue culture is still the leading diagnostic method; nevertheless, molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are currently relevant to differentiate between species. First-line treatment consists of azoles; however, it has an excellent prognosis even without treatment. Primary cutaneous coccidioidomycosis should be considered a differential diagnosis of unusual infections or neoformations in any part of the body in resident populations of endemic areas or in patients with a previous history of travel to these areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.