Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32557267›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2020

The impact of lime additions on mercury dynamics in stream chemistry and macroinvertebrates: a comparison of watershed and direct stream addition management strategies.

Geoffrey D Millard, Karen Riva-Murray, Douglas A Burns, Mario R Montesdeoca, Charles T Driscoll

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey D MillardDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA. millard.geoffrey@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-4837
Karen Riva-MurrayU.S. Geological Survey New York Water Science Center, Troy, NY, 12180, USA.
Douglas A BurnsU.S. Geological Survey New York Water Science Center, Troy, NY, 12180, USA.
Mario R MontesdeocaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.
Charles T DriscollDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.
Syracuse University · USUnited States Geological Survey · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acid deposition has declined across eastern North America and northern Europe due to reduced emissions of sulfur and nitrogen oxides. Ecosystem recovery has been slow with limited improvement in surface water chemistry. Delayed recovery has encouraged acid-neutralization strategies to accelerate recovery of impaired biological communities. Lime application has been shown to increase pH and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which could also drive increased mobilization of mercury (Hg) to surface waters. A four-year study was conducted within Honnedaga Lake's watershed in the Adirondack region of New York to compare the effects of watershed and direct channel lime additions on Hg in stream water and macroinvertebrates. All treatments sharply increased stream pH and DOC concentrations, but large differences in the duration of impacts were apparent. The watershed treatment resulted in multi-year increases in concentrations and loads of total Hg (150%; 390%), DOC (190%; 350%) and nutrients, whereas total Hg and DOC increased for short periods (72-96 h) after channel treatments. No response of Hg in macroinvertebrates was evident following the watershed treatment, but a potential short-term and spatially constrained increase occurred after the channel treatment. Our observations indicate that both treatment approaches mobilize Hg, but that direct channel liming mobilizes considerably less than watershed liming over any period longer than a few days. During the final study year, increased methyl Hg concentrations were observed across reference and treated streams, which may reflect an extended dry period, highlighting that climate variation may also affect Hg dynamics.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringAnimalsBiotaCarbonEcosystemEuropeInvertebratesMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsNew YorkRiversWater Pollutants, ChemicalCarbonMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalCalcium carbonateMacro-invertebratesMercuryMethylmercuryRemediationStream

Identifiers

PMID32557267
OpenAlexW3036863901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.