Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32557243›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2020

Analysis of Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions in Paediatric Patients in a University Hospital in the Netherlands.

Anne T M Dittrich, Jos M T Draaisma, Eugène P van Puijenbroek, D Maroeska W M Te Loo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne T M DittrichDepartment of Paediatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Huispost 804, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. anne.dittrich@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7722-4585
Jos M T DraaismaDepartment of Paediatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Huispost 804, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eugène P van PuijenbroekNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
D Maroeska W M Te LooDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe risk to develop adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is high for paediatric patients. This is, amongst other reasons, due to the inevitable use of off-label and unlicensed medicines. Moreover, there is limited knowledge on ADRs in children. Thus, adequate recognition may be challenging. The lack of dedicated studies and the voluntary nature of pharmacovigilance systems used to gain insight into the characteristics of ADRs contribute to this problem. The goal of this study is to identify whether ADRs in paediatric patients are adequately documented by the medical team and whether they are subsequently reported to the national pharmacovigilance system.

methodsAll patients admitted to the paediatric medium care of the Radboudumc Amalia Children's hospital during 1 month, and using one or more drugs, were included. Two researchers analysed retrospectively and independently the number of possible ADRs in the medical records. The ADRs were listed per paediatric subspecialty, to evaluate any differences in documentation and reporting of the ADRs. Subsequently, the causality, severity, and seriousness of the ADRs were assessed. The ADRs were categorised by system organ class and drug class. The national pharmacovigilance centre was consulted to check if there were any reports coming from our hospital and to collect the total number of reports.

resultsThe medical records of 301 patients were analysed, 81 patients were suffering from one or more ADRs. In total 132 suspected ADRs were found, divided among 19 different paediatric subspecialties. Numbers were too small to investigate the differences in ADR documentation. Of these found ADRs, 55% were not explicitly noted as such in the medical records by the treating physician. None of the ADRs were reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre. Most ADRs scored 'possible' in the causality assessment, were mild or moderate, and a small number were serious. The ADRs occurred in 25 different organ systems. In total 25 different drug classes were involved.

conclusionsThe results of the present study show that a large number of ADRs are not registered in the medical records and are not reported to the national pharmacovigilance system. Furthermore, it is shown that the number of ADRs occurring at our centre is much higher than the number reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre. Only an average of 513 ADRs in paediatric patients are reported per year nationwide, suggesting that there is extensive underreporting.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsPharmacovigilanceChildChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantMaleNetherlandsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32557243
PMCPMC7383033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.