Trial reportMolecular diagnosis & therapy2020
Epi proColon
Trial report in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: redefining surgical decision-making.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- In silico design and immunoinformatics evaluation of a multi-epitope vaccine targeting SEPT9 for gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas.BMC immunology · 2026Article
- The Future of Epigenetics: Emerging Technologies and Clinical Applications.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of gastrointestinal cancers: Current landscape and emerging technologies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal adenoma: The emerging potential of blood-based biomarkers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Epigenetics of Childhood Obesity.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy, multi-cancer early detection, and artificial intelligence: new frontiers in cancer screening from a technological and immunological perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Epi-liquidomics: redefining cancer diagnostics through epigenetic profiling.Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics · 2026Review
- Non-invasive colorectal cancer screening methods: focusing on diagnostic genetic and epigenetic markers.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Review
- Precision Oncology: Current Landscape, Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cells · 2025Review
- Could artificial intelligence-powered colonoscopies change the future of colorectal cancer screening?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Aptamer-Based Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Detection: Emerging Technologies and Future Directions.Biosensors · 2025Review
- From Lab to Clinic: Artificial Intelligence with Spectroscopic Liquid Biopsies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prognostic Significance of the Comprehensive Biomarker Analysis in Colorectal Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microfluidic Liquid Biopsy Minimally Invasive Cancer Diagnosis by Nano-Plasmonic Label-Free Detection of Extracellular Vesicles: Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Solid Tumours: An Overview.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: A snapshot of the current state of the art.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Methylation ofAdvanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epi proColon
Indexed as
Identifiers
32557236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.