Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32557214›Full record

ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2020

Potential Role of Anti-interleukin (IL)-6 Drugs in the Treatment of COVID-19: Rationale, Clinical Evidence and Risks.

Salvatore Crisafulli, Valentina Isgrò, Laura La Corte, Fabiola Atzeni, Gianluca Trifirò

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. COVID-19: A novel holistic systems biology approach to predict its molecular mechanisms (in vitro) and repurpose drugs.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The human genetic epidemiology of COVID-19.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salvatore CrisafulliDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Policlinico Universitario "G. Martino", Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Valentina IsgròDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Policlinico Universitario "G. Martino", Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy.
Laura La CorteRheumatology Unit, Department of Experimental and Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Fabiola AtzeniRheumatology Unit, Department of Experimental and Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Gianluca TrifiròDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Policlinico Universitario "G. Martino", Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy. trifirog@unime.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1147-7296
University of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemic due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been spreading globally, raising increasing concerns. This public health emergency has triggered a race to find medications to improve the prognosis of this disease. There is currently great interest in drug repositioning to manage SARS-CoV-2 infection, that is, the evaluation of the potential benefits of a drug that has already been proven safe and effective in humans for other approved indications. As interleukin-6 (IL-6) acts as a key driver of the inflammation associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), IL-6 and IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) inhibition appear to be promising targets for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. It is important to critically analyze the available evidence concerning the use of the available anti-IL-6 (siltuximab) and anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab and sarilumab) agents in COVID-19 patients, in terms of both benefit and risk. In this review, the pathogenesis of the cytokine storm induced by COVID-19, the role of IL-6 in this cytokine storm, the rationale for the use of anti-IL-6 agents, and key information on potential benefits and safety monitoring of these biologicals in COVID-19 patients is discussed.

Indexed as

Interleukin-6 InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralReceptors, Interleukin-6Risk AssessmentSafetyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInterleukin-6 InhibitorsReceptors, Interleukin-6sarilumabsiltuximabtocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID32557214
PMCPMC7299248
OpenAlexW3036445027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.