Observational studyDrug safety2020
Association Between Intravitreal Aflibercept and Serious Non-ocular Haemorrhage Compared with Intravitreal Ranibizumab: A Multicentre Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Research on Retinal Diseases Using Health Claims Database: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIntravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs aflibercept and ranibizumab are used in neovascular retinal diseases but may be associated with non-ocular haemorrhage.
aimsOur objective was to compare the risk of non-ocular haemorrhage with intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab and with individual intravitreal anti-VEGFs versus intravitreal dexamethasone.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using four Italian claims databases, covering 18 million inhabitants from 2011 to 2016. Incident aflibercept users were matched 1:4 to incident ranibizumab users. The outcome was incident non-ocular haemorrhage requiring hospitalisation. Incidence per 1000 person-years (PYs) was estimated. Patients were followed for 180 days using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. An as-treated (AT) approach was also employed, using grace periods of 60 or 90 days. Analyses were repeated for aflibercept versus dexamethasone and ranibizumab versus dexamethasone. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsWe identified incident users of intravitreal ranibizumab (n = 21,766), aflibercept (n = 3150) and dexamethasone (n = 3900). The incidence of haemorrhage was four events per 1000 PYs for each drug. Aflibercept was not associated with increased risk versus ranibizumab at 180 days (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.37-2.56]). Results were consistent in the AT analysis (HR 1.19 [95% CI 0.52-2.75]). No increased risk was found for aflibercept and ranibizumab at 180 days versus dexamethasone (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.30-2.60] and HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.33-1.38], respectively).
conclusionNo association was identified between intravitreal aflibercept and non-ocular haemorrhage versus ranibizumab. A comparable risk for these intravitreal anti-VEGFs and intravitreal dexamethasone was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.