Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32557069›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Assessment of the air pollution emission reduction effect of the coal substitution policy in China: an improved grey modelling approach.

Ming-Huan Shou, Zheng-Xin Wang, Dan-Dan Li, Yi Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How Fast to Avoid Carbon Emissions: A Holistic View on the RES, Storage and Non-RES Replacement in Romania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ming-Huan ShouSchool of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China.
Zheng-Xin WangSchool of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China.
Dan-Dan LiSchool of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China. lidandan@zufe.edu.cn.
Yi WangSchool of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, 310018, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the Chinese government has proposed a policy to replace coal use with natural gas and electricity in the northern region to reduce the air pollution caused by the large consumption of coal. In order to assess the air pollution reduction effect of the coal substitution policy in Liaoning Province, this paper proposes a data grouping grey model with a fractional order accumulation (FDGGM (1,1)). The empirical analysis results show that the new grey model can predict the monthly coal consumption more accurately than the traditional DGGM (1,1) model. The MAPEs of the training set in the FDGGM(1,1) and DGGM(1,1) models are 4.58% and 5.48%, and the MAPEs of the test set are 23.89% and 33.78%, respectively. And the policy achieves a great success based on the FDGGM(1,1) model. During the policy implementation period (from January 2015 to December 2018), the coal consumption in Liaoning Province decreased by 27.2501 million tons, while the emissions of CO

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionChinaCoalNatural GasPower PlantsAir PollutantsCoalNatural GasAir pollutionCoal substitution policyFDGGM(1,1)Fractional order accumulationGrey modelPolicy assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.