ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Removal of ochratoxin A from liquid media using novel low-cost biosorbents.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly efficient adsorptive removal of the carcinogen aflatoxin BEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Adsorptive potential of two natural enterosorbents for removing aflatoxin BMycotoxin research · 2025Article
- Untreated plant waste of the Mediterranean region as bioadsorbent of persistent organic pollutants.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Promising Phytogenic Feed Additives Used as Anti-Mycotoxin Solutions in Animal Nutrition.Toxins · 2024Review
- Isothermal and Kinetics Modeling Approach for the Bioremediation of Potentially Toxic Trace Metal Ions Using a Novel Biosorbent Acalypha wilkesiana (Copperleaf) Leaves.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Insights into Ochratoxin A: Occurrence, Analysis, and Control Strategies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- In Vitro Evaluation of the Adsorption Efficacy of Biochar Materials on Aflatoxin BAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Review
- From Grapes to Wine: Impact of the Vinification Process on Ochratoxin A Contamination.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Colocasia esculenta stem as novel biosorbent for potentially toxic metals removal from aqueous system.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ground shells of almonds (ALM), hazelnuts (HAZ), walnuts (WAL), and chestnuts (CHE), coconut fiber (COC), spent coffee grounds (COF), and clementine peel (CLE) were used to remove ochratoxin A (OTA) from both water and an ethanol/water mixture (14:86, v/v). Other very efficient adsorbents like wood biochar (BC) and hydrochar (HC) and a humic acid (HA) were also adopted as a comparison. In batch experiments, sorption of OTA from water followed the trend BC (100% removed) > HA > CLE > COC > HC > COF > ALM > HAZ > CHE > WAL (8% removed), whereas sorption of OTA from ethanol/water mixture (14:86, v/v) onto only the raw materials was COC (54% removed) > CLE > HAZ > ALM > COF > CHE > WAL (0.4% removed). The desorption of the toxin from all materials in water was rather low. Afterwards, sorption kinetics and isotherms of OTA onto CLE, COC, and COF were performed. The three materials adsorbed OTA in about 2 h according to a pseudo-second-order kinetic model, thus indicating the occurrence of a chemisorption mechanism. Equilibrium sorption data of OTA onto CLE followed preferentially the Freundlich model, whereas those on COC and COF fitted well both Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms (r > 0.996). The values of Freundlich sorption constants, K
Indexed as
Identifiers
32557031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.