Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32557000›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2021

Comparison of a fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser and 5% amorolfine lacquer combination therapy versus a 5% amorolfine lacquer monotherapy for the treatment of onychomycosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Jing Zhang, Yunqing Zhang, Jinglin Qin, Sha Lu, Wenying Cai, Jiahao Li, Huaiqiu Huang, Sulian Yang, Liyan Xi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Fractional COLasers in surgery and medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jing ZhangDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. zhangj0811@126.com.
Yunqing ZhangDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China.
Jinglin QinDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Sha LuDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Wenying CaiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jiahao LiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Huaiqiu HuangDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China.
Sulian YangDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China.
Liyan XiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Sun Yat-sen Clinical Research Cultivating Program SYS-Q-201705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the efficacy of 2940-nm Er:YAG laser treatment combined with a 5% amorolfine lacquer versus amorolfine monotherapy for treating onychomycosis. In this study, patients with onychomycosis of the great toenail were randomly assigned to a combination therapy group and a monotherapy group. In the combination therapy group, the included toenails were treated with a fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12, combined with a 5% amorolfine lacquer twice a week for 12 weeks, while in the monotherapy group, the included toenails were treated with only a 5% amorolfine lacquer twice a week for 12 weeks. The onychomycosis severity index (OSI) score and the mycological clearance rate (MCR) of the included toenails were assessed at baseline, week 12, and week 24. At weeks 12 and 24, the great toenails with mild and moderate onychomycosis in the combination therapy group showed obvious improvement and a greater decrease in OSI than those in the monotherapy group. At week 24, the toenails with mild and moderate onychomycosis in the combination therapy group also showed a better MCR. For the toenails with severe onychomycosis, little improvement was observed in either group at week 12 or week 24. In conclusion, fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser treatment combined with a 5% amorolfine lacquer is more effective than amorolfine monotherapy in short-term improvement of onychomycosis.

Indexed as

LacquerAdultAntifungal AgentsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLasers, Solid-StateMaleMorpholinesNailsOnychomycosisPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeamorolfineAntifungal AgentsMorpholinesAmorolfineFractional Er:YAG laserLaser therapyOnychomycosis

Identifiers

PMID32557000
OpenAlexW3035995818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.