Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556973›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2020

Acoustic Speech Analytics Are Predictive of Cerebellar Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis.

Gustavo Noffs, Frederique M C Boonstra, Thushara Perera, Scott C Kolbe, Jim Stankovich, Helmut Butzkueven, Andrew Evans, Adam P Vogel, Anneke van der Walt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensitive Quantification of Cerebellar Speech Abnormalities Using Deep Learning Models.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gustavo NoffsCentre for Neuroscience of Speech, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. gustavo.noffs@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8905-7879
Frederique M C BoonstraDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Thushara PereraThe Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
Scott C KolbeDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jim StankovichDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Helmut ButzkuevenDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew EvansDepartment of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Adam P VogelCentre for Neuroscience of Speech, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Anneke van der WaltDepartment of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Bionics Institute · AUMonash University · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1082910National Health and Medical Research Council 1085461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech production relies on motor control and cognitive processing and is linked to cerebellar function. In diseases where the cerebellum is impaired, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), speech abnormalities are common and can be detected by instrumental assessments. However, the potential of speech assessments to be used to monitor cerebellar impairment in MS remains unexplored. The aim of this study is to build an objectively measured speech score that reflects cerebellar function, pathology and quality of life in MS. Eighty-five people with MS and 21 controls participated in the study. Speech was independently assessed through objective acoustic analysis and blind expert listener ratings. Cerebellar function and overall disease disability were measured through validated clinical scores; cerebellar pathology was assessed via magnetic resonance imaging, and validated questionnaires informed quality of life. Selected speech variables were entered in a regression model to predict cerebellar function. The resulting model was condensed into one composite speech score and tested for prediction of abnormal 9-hole peg test (9HPT), and for correlations with the remaining cerebellar scores, imaging measurements and self-assessed quality of life. Slow rate of syllable repetition and increased free speech pause percentage were the strongest predictors of cerebellar impairment, complemented by phonatory instability. Those variables formed the acoustic composite score that accounted for 54% of variation in cerebellar function, correlated with cerebellar white matter volume (r = 0.3, p = 0.017), quality of life (r = 0.5, p < 0.001) and predicted an abnormal 9HPT with 85% accuracy. An objective multi-feature speech metric was highly representative of motor cerebellar impairment in MS.

Indexed as

AdultCerebellar DiseasesCerebellumFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNeuropsychological TestsQuality of LifeSpeechWhite Matterbiomarkersdisability evaluationmagnetic resonance imagingMultiple Sclerosisquality of lifespeech acoustics

Identifiers

PMID32556973
OpenAlexW3036056725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.