Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556913›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Boundary Restored Network for Subpleural Pulmonary Lesion Segmentation on Ultrasound Images at Local and Global Scales.

Yupeng Xu, Yi Zhang, Ke Bi, Zhiyu Ning, Lisha Xu, Mengjun Shen, Guoying Deng, Yin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19-The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning: A Newfangled.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yupeng XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Disease, Shanghai Engineering Center for Visual Science and Photomedicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4788-7003
Yi ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Ke BiDepartment of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Zhiyu NingSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Lisha XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Mengjun ShenDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Guoying DengTrauma Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China. guoying.deng@qq.com.
Yin WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China. lpbbl@aliyun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the application of machine learning for the detection of subpleural pulmonary lesions (SPLs) in ultrasound (US) scans, we propose a novel boundary-restored network (BRN) for automated SPL segmentation to avoid issues associated with manual SPL segmentation (subjectivity, manual segmentation errors, and high time consumption). In total, 1612 ultrasound slices from 255 patients in which SPLs were visually present were exported. The segmentation performance of the neural network based on the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), Jaccard similarity metric (Jaccard), Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD), and Maximum symmetric surface distance (MSSD) was assessed. Our dual-stage boundary-restored network (BRN) outperformed existing segmentation methods (U-Net and a fully convolutional network (FCN)) for the segmentation accuracy parameters including DSC (83.45 ± 16.60%), MCC (0.8330 ± 0.1626), Jaccard (0.7391 ± 0.1770), ASSD (5.68 ± 2.70 mm), and MSSD (15.61 ± 6.07 mm). It also outperformed the original BRN in terms of the DSC by almost 5%. Our results suggest that deep learning algorithms aid fully automated SPL segmentation in patients with SPLs. Further improvement of this technology might improve the specificity of lung cancer screening efforts and could lead to new applications of lung US imaging.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedEarly Detection of CancerHumansLungLung NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional neural network (CNN)Deep learningImage segmentationSubpleural pulmonary lesion (SPL) segmentationUltrasound image

Identifiers

PMID32556913
PMCPMC7573030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.