Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556911›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Optical Flow Methods for Lung Nodule Segmentation on LIDC-IDRI Images.

R Jenkin Suji, Sarita Singh Bhadouria, Joydip Dhar, W Wilfred Godfrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Jenkin SujiABV-IIITM Gwalior, ABV-IIITM Campus, Morena Link Road, Gwalior, MadhyaPradesh, 474010, India. sujijenkin@gmail.com.
Sarita Singh BhadouriaRGPV Bhopal, Gandhi Nagar, MadhyaPradesh, 462033, India.
Joydip DharABV-IIITM Gwalior, ABV-IIITM Campus, Morena Link Road, Gwalior, MadhyaPradesh, 474010, India.
W Wilfred GodfreyABV-IIITM Gwalior, ABV-IIITM Campus, Morena Link Road, Gwalior, MadhyaPradesh, 474010, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung nodule segmentation is an essential step in any CAD system for lung cancer detection and diagnosis. Traditional approaches for image segmentation are mainly morphology based or intensity based. Motion-based segmentation techniques tend to use the temporal information along with the morphology and intensity information to perform segmentation of regions of interest in videos. CT scans comprise of a sequence of dicom 2-D image slices similar to videos which also comprise of a sequence of image frames ordered on a timeline. In this work, Farneback, Horn-Schunck and Lucas-Kanade optical flow methods have been used for processing the dicom slices. The novelty of this work lies in the usage of optical flow methods, generally used in motion-based segmentation tasks, for the segmentation of nodules from CT images. Since thin-sliced CT scans are the imaging modality considered, they closely approximate the motion videos and are the primary motivation for using optical flow for lung nodule segmentation. This paper also provides a detailed comparative analysis and validates the effectiveness of using optical flow methods for segmentation. Finally, we propose methods to further improve the efficiency of segmentation using optical flow methods on CT scans.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsOptic FlowSolitary Pulmonary NoduleHumansLungRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyOptical flowPulmonary noduleSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID32556911
PMCPMC7572960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.