Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556825›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Development and usability of a feedback tool, "My Personal Brain Health Dashboard", to improve setting of self-management goals among people living with HIV in Canada.

Maryam Mozafarinia, Fateme Rajabiyazdi, Marie-Josee Brouillette, Lesley K Fellows, Nancy E Mayo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and usability of a feedback tool, "My Personal Brain Health Dashboard", to improve setting of self-management goals among people living with HIV in Canada.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  5. Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maryam MozafariniaDivision of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. maryam.mozafarinia@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6498-9469
Fateme RajabiyazdiDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Marie-Josee BrouilletteCenter for Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE), McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, 5252 de Maisonneuve, Montreal, Canada.
Lesley K FellowsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery and Chronic Viral Illness Service, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Nancy E MayoCenter for Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE), McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, 5252 de Maisonneuve, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research 273Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA) 125272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective(1) To develop a personalized health outcome profile as a feedback tool to improve self-management in people living with chronic conditions such as HIV and (2) to evaluate the interpretability and usefulness of the feedback tool for setting specific goals.

methodsThe development of "My Personal Brain Health Dashboard" was inspired by the knowledge-to-action framework. A health outcome profile was computer generated in SAS from the outcome measures, at first and last recorded visits, of each person enrolled in the +BHN cohort from five sites in Canada. The Wilson-Cleary model framed the outcome measurement strategy. Single actionable items with evidence of life impact were chosen. The response option from the original item was the person's value and the optimal level was provided to help persons compare their results to an optimal target. Cognitive interviews were conducted with members of HIV community. Appropriateness of the Dashboard for goal-setting was tested by asking participants to write specific goals according to the Dashboard they were given.

resultsFifteen respondents were recruited from Montreal and Vancouver. Items most endorsed to be changed were cognition, pain, and body mass index. 80% found the Dashboard useful for setting health-related goals. A total of 85 goals were set, the text of which was mined to create a lexicon for scoring goal quality in future endeavours.

conclusionThis study was the preparatory phase for a future trial on a method to stimulate setting specific goals. The future trial would provide a thorough understanding of the quality of person-defined goals.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-ManagementBrainCanadaFeedbackGoalsHumansQuality of LifeChronic conditionsCognitive interviewsGoal-settingHealth outcome profileHIV/AIDS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.