Observational studySurgical endoscopy2021
What delays your case start? Exploring operating room inefficiencies.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Economic Impact of Standardization and Digitalization in the Operating Room: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical systems · 2023Pooled it
- Operating room performance metrics of anesthesia and surgery duration: a descriptive analysis of emergency surgical cases.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Putting Patients at Risk: The Effect of Health Care Provider Burnout on Patient Care in the Operating Room-A Narrative Review.Journal of patient safety · 2025Review
- Assessing the Precision of Surgery Duration Estimation: A Retrospective Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImproving operating room (OR) inefficiencies benefits the OR team, hospital, and patients alike but the available literature is limited. Our goal was, using a novel surgical application, to identify any OR incidents that cause delays from the time the patient enters the OR till procedure start (preparatory phase). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an IRB approved, prospective, observational study between July 2018 and January 2019. Using a novel surgical application (ExplORer Surgical) three observers recorded disrupting incidents and their duration during the preparatory phase of a variety of general surgery cases. Specifically, the number and duration of anesthesia delays, unnecessary/distracting conversations, missing items, and other delays were recorded from the moment they started until they stopped affecting the normal workflow.
resultsNinety-six OR cases were assessed. 20 incidents occurred in 18 (19%) of those cases. The average preparatory duration for all the cases was 20.7 ± 8.6 min. Cases without incidents lasted 19.5 ± 7.4 min while cases with incidents lasted 25.9 ± 11.2 min, p = 0.03. The average incident lasted 3.7 min, approximately 18% of the preparatory phase duration.
conclusionThe use of the ExplORer Surgical app allowed us to accurately record the incidents happening during the preparatory phase of various general surgery operations. Such incidents significantly prolonged the preparatory duration. The identification of those inefficiencies is the first step to targeted interventions that may eventually optimize the efficiency of preoperative preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32556760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.