Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556743›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2020

Plasma metabolomic profile in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer and associations with the prostate-specific antigen and the Gleason score.

Pavel A Markin, Alex Brito, Natalia Moskaleva, Ekaterina V Lartsova, Yevgeny V Shpot, Yulia V Lerner, Vasily Y Mikhajlov, Natalia V Potoldykova, Dimitry V Enikeev, Michael R La Frano and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pavel A MarkinLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow, Russia, 119991.
Alex BritoLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow, Russia, 119991. abrito@labworks.ru.
Natalia MoskalevaLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow, Russia, 119991.
Ekaterina V LartsovaUniversity Clinical Hospital, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Yevgeny V ShpotResearch Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Yulia V LernerDepartment of Pathological Anatomy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Vasily Y MikhajlovUniversity Clinical Hospital, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia V PotoldykovaResearch Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Dimitry V EnikeevResearch Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Michael R La FranoDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
Svetlana A AppolonovaLaboratory of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolomic Analysis, Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya St., Moscow, Russia, 119991. svetlana.appolonova@labworks.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-9032-1558
Sechenov University · RUCalifornia Polytechnic State University · USUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe metabolic alterations reflecting the influence of prostate cancer cells can be captured through metabolomic profiling.

objectiveTo characterize the plasma metabolomic profile in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsMetabolomics analyses were performed in plasma samples from individuals classified as non-cancerous control (n = 36), with PIN (n = 16), or PCa (n = 27). Untargeted [26 moieties identified after pre-processing by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)] and targeted [46 amino acids, carbohydrates, organic acids and fatty acids by GC/MS, and 16 nucleosides and amino acids by ultra performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole/mass spectrometry (UPLC-TQ/MS)] analyses were performed. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations were measured in all samples. In PCa patients, the Gleason scores were determined.

resultsThe metabolites that were best discriminated (p < 0.05, FDR < 0.2) for the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc comparing the control versus the PIN and PCa groups included isoleucine, serine, threonine, cysteine, sarcosine, glyceric acid, among several others. PIN was mainly characterized by alterations on steroidogenesis, glycine and serine metabolism, methionine metabolism and arachidonic acid metabolism, among others. In the case of PCa, the most predominant metabolic alterations were ubiquinone biosynthesis, catecholamine biosynthesis, thyroid hormone synthesis, porphyrin and purine metabolism. In addition, we identified metabolites that were correlated to the PSA [i.e. hypoxanthine (r = - 0.60, p < 0.05; r = - 0.54, p < 0.01) and uridine (r = - 0.58, p < 0.05; r = - 0.50, p < 0.01) in PIN and PCa groups, respectively] and metabolites that were significantly different in PCa patients with Gleason score < 7 and ≥ 7 [i.e. arachidonic acid, median (P25-P75) = 883.0 (619.8-956.4) versus 570.8 (505.6-651.8), respectively (p < 0.01)].

conclusionsThis human plasma metabolomic assessment contributes to the understanding of the unique metabolic features exhibited in PIN and PCa and provides a list of metabolites that can have the potential to be used as biomarkers for early detection of disease progression and management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorChromatography, LiquidChromobox Protein Homolog 5Fatty AcidsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMass SpectrometryMetabolomeMetabolomicsMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPlasmaProstate-Specific AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCBX5 protein, humanChromobox Protein Homolog 5Fatty AcidsProstate-Specific AntigenGas chromatography/mass spectrometryMetabolomeMetabolomicsProstate cancerUltra performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole/mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID32556743
OpenAlexW3036130529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.