Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556732›Full record

ArticlePlanta2020

The Ve-resistance locus, a plant signaling intercept.

Ross N Nazar, Xin Xu, Tae Won Kim, Shin Woo Lee, Jane Robb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ross N NazarDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. rnnazar@uoguelph.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-1038
Xin XuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Tae Won KimGyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services, Jinju, 52733, Korea.
Shin Woo LeeDepartment of Agronomy and Medicinal Plant Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology, Jinju, 52725, Korea.
Jane RobbDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN 2961-2010Rural Development Administration PJ008097022013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe Ve-resistance locus in tomato and potato affects both stress/defense and growth, consistent with a signaling intercept and a competitive regulatory mechanism. Acting in an antagonistic fashion, the two genes comprising the tomato Ve-resistance locus have been shown to influence both the defense/stress cascade, which causes wilt symptoms, and plant growth (Nazar et al. in Planta 247:1339-1350, 2018c); in contrast, both have been reported to elevate wilt resistance in potato or Arabidopsis. In a further examination of this influence in potato transformed with the Ve1 gene, effects are again demonstrated with respect to both disease resistance and crop productivity consistent with the Ve locus being a signaling intercept and the antagonistic effects, previously observed in tomato. The results support a competitive model in which the tomato Ve1 and Ve2 proteins act to reduce the detrimental effects of the defense/stress cascade and energy transfers to the developing potato tubers.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionGenetic LociPlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityPlant ProteinsSolanum lycopersicumVerticilliumPlant ProteinsDevelopmentPlant defenseReceptor signalingSignaling crosstalkVerticillium wilt

Identifiers

PMID32556732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.