ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021
Simultaneous evaluation of symptoms, swallowing functions, and patient-reported swallowing difficulties and their correlations with ingestion status during definitive chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Preservation of remnant esophagus during total pharyngolaryngectomy in a patient with previous subtotal esophagectomy: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Eustachian Tube Functions in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo clarify the correlations among symptoms, swallowing functions, and ingestion status and to validate a method of swallowing evaluation during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for head and neck cancer.
methodsOropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients who were to receive definitive CRT as initial treatment were included in this prospective, single-center, observational study. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) for ingestion status and grades of symptoms (dryness, dysgeusia, mucositis, and the analgesic ladder); the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale on fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) on videofluoroscopic (VF) evaluation for swallowing functions; and the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) questionnaire were assessed at 5 time points unless the participant refused. The FEES and VF evaluation findings at each point were also compared.
resultsThere were 38 participants. Dysgeusia, mucositis, and pain grade, as well as the FOIS score, were the worst at 70 Gy and then improved after treatment. The improvements of pharyngeal residue and the PAS after treatment were limited. The EAT-10 and the pain ladder were highly correlated with the FOIS changes at many time points. The VF evaluation rate dropped after 40 Gy, whereas the FEES rate remained high. There were good correlations between pharyngeal residue and the PAS at 0 Gy, 70 Gy, and 3 months.
conclusionThe EAT-10 and pain reflected the FOIS score changes well, while two swallowing evaluations did not. To avoid aspiration, VF evaluation may not be necessary during CRT because of high correlations with pharyngeal residue on FEES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.