Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556683›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020

Is There Still a Role for Aspirin in Primary Prevention in Women in 2020?

Elisabeth M Sulaica, Bernadette D Asias-Dinh, Matthew A Wanat, Kim K Birtcher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabeth M SulaicaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4849 Calhoun Road Health 2, Room 3044, Houston, TX, 77204-5039, USA. emsulaic@central.uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5655-5318
Bernadette D Asias-DinhDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4849 Calhoun Road Health 2, Room 3044, Houston, TX, 77204-5039, USA.
Matthew A WanatDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4849 Calhoun Road Health 2, Room 3044, Houston, TX, 77204-5039, USA.
Kim K BirtcherDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4849 Calhoun Road Health 2, Room 3044, Houston, TX, 77204-5039, USA.
University of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAspirin's place in primary prevention for females has not been well delineated and has been under increased scrutiny in light of recent literature and guideline recommendations. The purpose of this review is to discuss current literature reviewing aspirin use for primary prevention in women and to discuss when use is appropriate. RECENT

findingsThe Women's Health Study found no differences in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in women randomized to aspirin vs. placebo, though a significant reduction was observed in women ≥ 65 years. More recent literature evaluated outcomes for primary prevention use in patients at increased cardiovascular risk, patients with diabetes, and patients who are elderly. These trials found either no benefit in MACE outcomes or a slight benefit accompanied by an increased risk of bleeding. Furthermore, no difference in outcomes were found in subgroup analyses comparing females receiving aspirin vs. placebo or comparing events in males vs. females. With improvements in risk factor reduction, such as blood pressure control, statin use, diabetes management, and smoking cessation, the role of aspirin for primary prevention in women is still uncertain. Aspirin use for primary prevention in females has failed to show a clear benefit except in women ≥ 65 years old, with a potential increase in bleeding events. An effort to better study aspirin in female patients would allow for better identification of women who would or would not benefit from therapy.

Indexed as

Primary PreventionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAspirinCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRisk FactorsAspirinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAspirinFemalePrimary preventionWomen

Identifiers

PMID32556683
OpenAlexW3036039796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.