Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556665›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020

Nutrient Profiling Systems, Front of Pack Labeling, and Consumer Behavior.

Naglaa H El-Abbadi, Salima F Taylor, Renata Micha, Jeffrey B Blumberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naglaa H El-AbbadiFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0772-8112
Salima F TaylorFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Renata MichaFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Jeffrey B BlumbergFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. Jeffrey.Blumberg@tufts.edu.
Tufts University · US

Funding

Cost-Effectiveness of Health System and State-Level Strategies to Improve Diet and Reduce Cardiometabolic DiseasesR01HL115189 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI DARIUSH MOZAFFARIAN · 2013 to 2026
$8.2M
Economic Analyses of Policy Strategies to Improve Diet and Reduce CVDR01HL130735 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI MICHA, EIRINI (RENATA) · 2016 to 2019
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115189NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGuiding consumers toward more healthful food choices may help address the high prevalence of poor dietary quality and diet-related diseases. The use of front-of-package labels (FOPL) on food items is expanding to provide focused nutritional information or representations, often based upon nutrient profiling systems. RECENT

findingsFOPL provide a source of nutrition and health information that is readily understood by consumers, including those with limited literacy. There is evidence that FOPL can shift consumer behavior toward more nutritious and healthful choices. However, assessments of the effectiveness of FOPL have been restricted in scope and rely largely on simulation models rather than real-world environments. FOPL are a direct source of nutritional guidance at the point-of-purchase and provide an opportunity to convey critical information on ingredients that are associated with health promotion and/or increased risk of non-communicable diseases. However, limited evidence regarding the most effective forms of FOPL to achieve behavior change and challenges from the food industry impedes the establishment of standardized nutrient profiles and algorithms. Future opportunities for FOPL include the potential for integrating nutritional profiles with non-nutrient factors affecting health such as food processing and environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorNutrientsNutritive ValueAdultChoice BehaviorDietFemaleFood LabelingFood PreferencesHealth PromotionHumansMaleNutritional StatusYoung AdultNutrientsConsumer behaviorFront-of-pack labelHealthy food choicesNutrient profiling systemsNutrition labeling

Identifiers

PMID32556665
OpenAlexW3036690660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.