Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556625›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Development of the "Core Yellow Flags Index" (CYFI) as a brief instrument for the assessment of key psychological factors in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Anne F Mannion, Francine Mariaux, Raluca Reitmeir, Tamas F Fekete, Daniel Haschtmann, Markus Loibl, Dezsö Jeszenszky, Frank S Kleinstück, François Porchet, Achim Elfering

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06612853 (Cross-cultural Adaptation Into German and Italian, Validation, Reproducibility, and Responsiveness of the Single-item Sleep Quality Scale in Spine Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06612853 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Cross-cultural Adaptation Into German and Italian, Validation, Reproducibility, and Responsiveness of the Single-item Sleep Quality Scale in Spine Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorSchulthess KlinikRan2024 to 2025Enrolled240ConditionsSpine DisorderArmsSleep Quality Scale (SQS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) comes of age: 18 years of efficient and effective patient-reported outcome measurement in the field of spinal disorders. Part 2. COMI item-content, scoring, language versions, and applications.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Evaluation of "appropriate use criteria" for surgical decision-making in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. A controlled, multicentre, prospective observational study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Does loss to follow-up lead to an overestimation of treatment success? Findings from a spine surgery registry of over 15,000 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Development of a machine-learning based model for predicting multidimensional outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne F MannionSpine Center Division, Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. anne.mannion@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1203-1096
Francine MariauxSpine Center Division, Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Raluca ReitmeirSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tamas F FeketeSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel HaschtmannSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus LoiblSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dezsö JeszenszkySpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frank S KleinstückSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
François PorchetSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Achim ElferingInstitute for Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Schulthess-Klinik · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression, anxiety, catastrophising, and fear-avoidance beliefs are key "yellow flags" (YFs) that predict a poor outcome in back patients. Most surgeons acknowledge the importance of YFs but have difficulty assessing them due to the complexity of the instruments used for their measurement and time constraints during consultations. We performed a secondary analysis of existing questionnaire data to develop a brief tool to enable the systematic evaluation of YFs and then tested it in clinical practice.

methodsThe following questionnaire datasets were available from a total of 932 secondary/tertiary care patients (61 ± 16 years; 51% female): pain catastrophising (N = 347); ZUNG depression (N = 453); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety subscale) (N = 308); fear-avoidance beliefs (N = 761). The single item that best represented the full-scale score was identified, to form the 4-item "Core Yellow Flags Index" (CYFI). 2422 patients (64 ± 16 years; 54% female) completed CYFI and a Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) before lumbar spine surgery, and a COMI 3 and 12 months later (FU).

resultsThe item-total correlation for each item with its full-length questionnaire was: 0.77 (catastrophising), 0.67 (depression), 0.69 (anxiety), 0.68 (fear-avoidance beliefs). Cronbach's α for the CYFI was 0.79. Structural equation modelling showed CYFI uniquely explained variance (p < 0.001) in COMI at both the 3- and 12-month FUs (β = 0.11 (women), 0.24 (men); and β = 0.13 (women), β = 0.14 (men), respectively).

conclusionThe 4-item CYFI proved to be a simple, practicable tool for routinely assessing key psychological attributes in spine surgery patients and made a relevant contribution in predicting postoperative outcome. CYFI's items were similar to those in the "STarT Back screening tool" used in primary care to triage patients into treatment pathways, further substantiating its validity. Wider use of CYFI may help improve the accuracy of predictive models derived using spine registry data.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresSpineAnxietyDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementSurveys and QuestionnairesCore Yellow Flags Index (CYFI)OutcomeRegistry dataSPINE surgeryYellow flags

Identifiers

PMID32556625
OpenAlexW3036785623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.