Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556617›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020

Simple change in logistic procedure improves response rate to QOL assessment: a report from the Japan Children's Cancer Group.

Iori Sato, Takafumi Soejima, Yasushi Ishida, Miho Maeda, Katsuyoshi Koh, Kiyoko Kamibeppu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iori SatoCenter for Quality of Life Research, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. satoi-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-6591
Takafumi SoejimaCenter for Quality of Life Research, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi IshidaCommittee on Long-term Follow-up, Japan Children's Cancer Group, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Miho MaedaCommittee on Long-term Follow-up, Japan Children's Cancer Group, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Katsuyoshi KohCommittee on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Japan Children's Cancer Group, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Kiyoko KamibeppuCenter for Quality of Life Research, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 201314012BNational Center for Child Health and Development 22shi-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing non-completion of quality-of-life assessment in clinical trials is an important challenge in obtaining accurate data and unbiased interpretation of patients' quality-of-life for each regimen. We evaluated the effect of changing our questionnaire distribution procedure in a multicenter phase II/III trial on the response rate to a quality-of-life questionnaire.

methodsIn the trial, we distributed 1767 questionnaires and 1045 were returned. We adopted a regression discontinuing design and estimated the change in response rate between pre-intervention (quality-of-life questionnaires were sent to each center soon after patient registration) and post-intervention (a set of tailored questionnaires was sent just before the first quality-of-life assessment).

resultsThe post-intervention response rate was higher (odds ratio = 1.62) than the pre-intervention response rate.

conclusionsA simple logistic intervention reduced the non-completion of QOL assessment in this case, suggesting that a simple change can contribute to improving clinical trial accomplishment.

Identifiers

PMID32556617
PMCPMC7300165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.