Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556562›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020

Epithelioid and spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma with FUS-TFCP2 or EWSR1-TFCP2 fusion: report of two cases.

John S A Chrisinger, Bret Wehrli, Brendan C Dickson, Samir Fasih, Angela C Hirbe, David B Shultz, Gelareh Zadeh, Abha A Gupta, Elizabeth G Demicco

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. EWSR1::ATF7 fusion driven mesenchymal neoplasm with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [The new WHO classification of jaw tumours].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

John S A ChrisingerDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. jschrisi@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7138-0923
Bret WehrliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Brendan C DicksonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Samir FasihPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Angela C HirbeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
David B ShultzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre & Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Gelareh ZadehDivision of Neurosurgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abha A GuptaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elizabeth G DemiccoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAWashington University in St. Louis · USUniversity Health Network · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone divides rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) into alveolar, embryonal, pleomorphic, and spindle cell/sclerosing types. Advances in molecular diagnostics have allowed for further refinement of RMS classification including the identification of new subtypes. Very rare RMS with epithelioid and spindle cell morphology, female predominance, marked osseous predilection, ALK expression, EWSR1/FUS-TFCP2 gene fusions, and highly aggressive clinical behavior have recently been recognized with only 23 cases reported in the English language literature. Herein, we report two additional cases with detailed clinicopathologic description and molecular confirmation. In brief, two young women presented each with a primary bone tumor-one with a frontal bone tumor and another with an osseous pelvic tumor. Both tumors showed epithelioid to spindle cell morphology, ALK expression, and EWSR1/FUS-TFCP2 gene fusions. Both patients died of disease less than 17 months from diagnosis despite administration of multiple lines of aggressive treatment. In addition, we review the literature and discuss differential diagnostic and potential treatment considerations.

Indexed as

Gene FusionAdultBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionDNA-Binding ProteinsEpithelioid CellsFatal OutcomeFemaleFrontal BoneGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPelvic NeoplasmsPhenotypeRhabdomyosarcomaRNA-Binding Protein EWSRNA-Binding Protein FUSBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsEWSR1 protein, humanFUS protein, humanRNA-Binding Protein EWSRNA-Binding Protein FUSTFCP2 protein, humanTranscription FactorsBoneEpithelioid and spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomaEWSR1-TFCP2FUS-TFCP2RhabdomyosarcomaTFCP2

Identifiers

PMID32556562
OpenAlexW3035803530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.