Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556509›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of neonatal professionals regarding pain management.

N-H Peng, M-C Lee, W-L Su, C-H Lee, C-H Chen, Y-C Chang, C-H Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neonatal Pain Management: Is There An Endocrinal Response?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Intranasal Fentanyl for Procedural Analgesia in Preterm Infants.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

N-H PengPutian University, Putian Nursing University, Putian, Fujian Province, P.R. China. forever.pal.lily@gmail.com.
M-C LeeDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital in Taichung, Hualien City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
W-L SuTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
C-H LeeNeonatology Department, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua City, Taiwan.
C-H ChenCenter for Faculty Development, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Y-C ChangDepartment of Mathematics, Tamkang University, Tamsui City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
C-H HuangNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hsin Chu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsin Chu City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital · TWChanghua Christian Hospital · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWPutian University · CNTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWTamkang University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain management is an important issue which impacts the prognosis of neonates in neonatal intensive care units. Evidence has shown that professionals' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management can impact the quality of their practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of neonatal professionals regarding neonatal pain management. A cross-sectional study was performed involving neonatal physicians and nurses, using a research questionnaire to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of professionals as well as to assess their practice of pain management. Research found an apparent discrepancy between the knowledge levels of neonatologists and nurses regarding pain assessment and management, with nurses displaying weaker professional knowledge and more negative attitudes toward pain management than did neonatologists. Additionally, research revealed a lack of knowledge and negative attitudes among participants regarding the provision of sufficient opioid analgesics to sick infants during invasive procedures and even for dying neonates. There is an urgent need for continuing education regarding neonatal pain management with the goal of empowering neonatal professionals; further research is needed into the question of how to translate education into more reliable practice.Conclusion: This research provides useful information regarding the knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of neonatal pain management among neonatologists and nurses and points out some differences in the knowledge levels of these two groups. What is Known: •Neonates can perceive and respond to pain stimuli by showing their biological signals similarly to children and adults. •Untreated or insufficient pain management for high-risk neonates has short-term. negative effects and may also induce long-term negative effects. What is New: •The level of knowledge, the attitudes, and the practices regarding neonatal pain in intensive care are different among neonatal professionals. •There is an urgent need to provide interdisciplinary continuing education to improve the knowledge of neonatal professionals and encourage them to more highly prioritize neonatal pain management.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePain ManagementAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalNeonatologistsSurveys and QuestionnairesNeonatal nursesNeonatal pain managementNeonatologistsPersonal attitudesProfessional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID32556509
OpenAlexW3036340822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.