ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020
Detection and clinical characteristics of serrated polyps and conventional adenomas between patients in the outpatient and physical checkup unit receiving colonoscopy.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Melanosis coli: a contrast effect or an oncogenic effect? A large-scale retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe sessile serrated adenoma/polyp detection rate (SSA/PDR) among different colonoscopy indications from daily practice has not been fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the detection and clinical characteristics of serrated polyps and conventional adenomas between outpatient department (OPD) and physical checkup unit (PCU) patients receiving colonoscopy.
methodsThe data for this retrospective study were collected between 2016 and 2017 at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan. A total of 7047 individuals were included, and information on polyp and adenoma detection was extracted from the colonoscopy reports.
resultsThe adenoma detection rate, the SSA/PDR, and the detection rate of traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) were 32.2%, 0.60%, and 0.50%, respectively. Risk analysis revealed no significant difference (p = 0.095) in SSA/PDR between individuals < 50 years and ≥ 50 years, and no trend of increased SSA/PDR as age increased was observed (p = 0.320). SSA/P and TSA had higher risks for synchronous advanced neoplasia than conventional adenoma, but with proximal hyperplastic polyps lower (p < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference of SSA/PDR between OPD and PCU patients was observed (p = 1.000); however, the age of SSA/P was significantly older in OPD than in PCU patients (p = 0.048).
conclusionThe detection rates of CA and TSA were associated with age groups; however, SSA/PDR was insignificantly higher among individuals aged < 50 years than those with other age groups. In addition, SSA/PDR between OPD and PCU patients was not significantly found in daily practice of colonoscopies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.