ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020
Three-dimensional femoral morphology in Hartofilakidis type C developmental dysplastic hips and the implications for total hip arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of mid-term outcomes in 334 developmental dysplasia hips treated with total hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Morphological and bone defect mapping analysis of true acetabulum in Crowe type IV hip dysplasia.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Mid-term outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in 106 Crowe II/III hips: different hip center positions.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
- [Three-dimensional morphological study of the effect of false acetabulum on the femoral structure in Crowe typeZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022Article
- Innovative Design Methodology for Patient-Specific Short Femoral Stems.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional morphological study of the proximal femur in Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesThe aim of this study was to describe and compare the femoral morphologies of Hartofilakidis types C1 and C2 developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and discuss the potential influence on subsequent total hip arthroplasty (THA).
methodsWe analyzed preoperative CT data from 81 patients (42 C1 and 39 C2 subtypes) who underwent THA for arthritis secondary to Hartofilakidis type C DDH. The CT data was three-dimensionally reconstructed and measured of following parameters: neck-shaft angle, femoral neck length, anteversion, medial inclination, femoral offset, height of the greater trochanter and femoral head, mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) widths of the medullary canal. The canal flare indices and ML-to-AP ratio were further calculated. We also reviewed surgical and follow-up records to compare the different implants utilized and the clinical results between C1 and C2 hips.
resultsThe C2 femurs had a significantly lower neck-shaft angle (119.0° vs. 124.0°), shorter femoral neck (37.0 mm vs. 41.2 mm), larger medial cortical inclination (158.8° vs. 149.1°), and higher position of the greater trochanter. The C2 femurs were narrower and had a smaller canal flare index (2.88 ± 0.50) than C1 femurs (3.64 ± 0.69). The ML-to-AP ratio of the proximal femoral medullary canal was significantly smaller in the C2 group. Accordingly, C2 femurs required thinner stems, more non-sprouted sleeves, and had a higher rate and required a longer length of shortening osteotomies. At an average follow-up of 36.0 months, the C1 and C2 groups had a similar Harris Hip Score (83.5 ± 14.3 vs. 84.2 ± 9.8, P = 0.771) and no stem loosening occurred in either group.
conclusionC1 and C2 proximal femurs have substantial differences in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. In the setting of THA, C2 femurs may therefore require thinner stems, more non-sprouted sleeves, and have a higher rate and require a longer length of shortening osteotomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32556383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.