ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2020
Transcriptional signature of resting-memory CD4 T cells differentiates spontaneous from treatment-induced HIV control.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hijacking Host Communication: The Central Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Infectious Disease Pathogenesis.Cells · 2026Review
- Latent HIV Reservoirs in the Central Nervous System: Mechanisms, Barriers, and Therapeutic Approaches.ACS infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Article
- Omic Technologies in HIV: Searching Transcriptional Signatures Involved in Long-Term Non-Progressor and HIV Controller Phenotypes.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- The reservoir of latent HIV.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The HIV reservoir is the main barrier to eradicating HIV infection, and resting memory CD4 T (Trm) cells are one of the most relevant cellular component harboring latent proviruses. This is the first study analyzing the transcriptional profile of Trm cells, in two well-characterized groups of HIV patients with distinct mechanisms of viral replication control (spontaneous versus treatment-induced). We use a systems biology approach to unravel subtle but important differences in the molecular mechanisms operating at the cellular level that could be associated with the host's ability to control virus replication and persistence. Despite the absence of significant differences in the transcriptome of Trm cells between Elite Controllers (ECs) and cART-treated (TX) patients at the single gene level, we found 353 gene ontology (GO) categories upregulated in EC compared with TX. Our results suggest the existence of mechanisms at two different levels: first boosting both adaptive and innate immune responses, and second promoting active viral replication and halting HIV latency in the Trm cell compartment of ECs as compared with TX patients. These differences in the transcriptional profile of Trm cells could be involved in the lower HIV reservoir observed in ECs compared with TX individuals, although mechanistic studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Combining transcriptome analysis and systems biology methods is likely to provide important findings to help us in the design of therapeutic strategies aimed at purging the HIV reservoir. KEY MESSAGES: HIV-elite controllers have the lowest HIV-DNA content in resting memory CD4 T cells. HIV-ECs show a particular transcriptional profile in resting memory CD4 T cells. Molecular mechanisms of enhanced adaptative and innate immune response in HIV-ECs. High viral replication and low viral latency establishment associate to the EC status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32556382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.