Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2020
Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01639209 (A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Retinal Detachment; Anatomical Success, Functional Success and Impact on Patient Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Retinal Detachment; Anatomical Success, Functional Success and Impact on Patient Quality of Life
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pneumatic retinopexy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: from a clinical trial to the real-life experience.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Quality of Life Following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Cost Burden and Cost-Effectiveness of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Review
- Review
- Modification of the pneumatic retinopexy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with multiple-quadrant retinal breaks.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Optical coherence tomography homography for detection of retinal displacement: a validation study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Article
- Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for the Management of Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Review
- Scleral Buckling: A Look at the Past, Present and Future in View of Recent Findings on the Importance of Photoreceptor Re-Alignment Following Retinal Re-Attachment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Treated With Pneumatic Retinopexy.JAMA ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Although rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair techniques have high anatomical reattachment rates, there may be differences in various aspects of postoperative vision-related quality of life (VRQoL). Objective: To explore the differences in various aspects of VRQoL between pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) following RRD repair. Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc exploratory analysis of the the Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes randomized clinical trial conducted between August 2012 and May 2017 at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Patients with RRD with a single break or multiple breaks within 1 clock hour of detached retina in the superior 8 clock hours of the retina with any number, location, and size of retinal breaks or lattice degeneration in attached retina. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 12 subscale scores between the PnR and PPV groups at 6 months following RRD repair. Results: A total of 160 patients were included in this analysis, with 81 patients (92%) and 79 patients (90%) in the PnR and PPV groups, respectively. The PnR group consisted of 32% women with a mean (SD) age of 60.9 (9.3) years, while the PPV group consisted of 38% women with a mean (SD) age of 60.3 (7.6) years. For the 152 patients with 6-month follow-up (75 patients in PnR [85%] and 77 patients in PPV [88%]), there was evidence for an association of PnR with superior vision-related functioning compared with PPV for several subscales. There were no differences between groups at 1 year. After adjusting for age, sex, baseline macular status, visual acuity in the nonstudy eye, and lens status, patients who underwent PnR had higher scores for distance activities (mean [SD] PnR, 88.7 [13.4]; PPV, 82.8 [17.1]; adjusted difference, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.6-11.4; P = .01), mental health (mean [SD] PnR, 84.3 [17.4]; PPV, 78.7 [21.1]; adjusted difference, 6.7; 95% CI, 0.4-13; P = .04), dependency (mean [SD] PnR, 96.1 [10.1]; PPV, 91.1 [18.6]; adjusted difference, 5.7; 95% CI, 0.6-10.8; P = .03), and peripheral vision (mean [SD] PnR, 91.6 [16.2]; PPV, 81.2 [24.4]; adjusted difference, 10.8; 95% CI, 4.3-17.4; P = .001) at 6 months. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings demonstrate that patients undergoing PnR for RRD report higher mental health scores and superior vision-related functioning scores in several subscales of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire during the first 6 months postoperatively compared with PPV. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01639209.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.