Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556156›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2020

Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rajeev H Muni, Carolina L M Francisconi, Tina Felfeli, Michael Y K Mak, Alan R Berger, David T Wong, Filiberto Altomare, Louis R Giavedoni, Radha P Kohly, Peter J Kertes and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01639209 (A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Retinal Detachment; Anatomical Success, Functional Success and Impact on Patient Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01639209 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Retinal Detachment; Anatomical Success, Functional Success and Impact on Patient Quality of Life

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2012 to 2017Enrolled176ConditionsRhegmatogenous Retinal DetachmentArmsVitrectomy, Pneumatic retinopexy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Optical coherence tomography homography for detection of retinal displacement: a validation study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  11. Pneumatic retinopexy: an update.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Rajeev H MuniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carolina L M FrancisconiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Tina FelfeliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael Y K MakDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alan R BergerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David T WongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Filiberto AltomareDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Louis R GiavedoniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Radha P KohlyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter J KertesDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natalia FigueiredoSt Michael's Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fei ZuoApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin E ThorpeApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Roxane J HillierNewcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Unity Health TorontoUniversity of Toronto · CAKensington Health · CADalhousie University · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair techniques have high anatomical reattachment rates, there may be differences in various aspects of postoperative vision-related quality of life (VRQoL). Objective: To explore the differences in various aspects of VRQoL between pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) following RRD repair. Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc exploratory analysis of the the Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes randomized clinical trial conducted between August 2012 and May 2017 at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Patients with RRD with a single break or multiple breaks within 1 clock hour of detached retina in the superior 8 clock hours of the retina with any number, location, and size of retinal breaks or lattice degeneration in attached retina. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 12 subscale scores between the PnR and PPV groups at 6 months following RRD repair. Results: A total of 160 patients were included in this analysis, with 81 patients (92%) and 79 patients (90%) in the PnR and PPV groups, respectively. The PnR group consisted of 32% women with a mean (SD) age of 60.9 (9.3) years, while the PPV group consisted of 38% women with a mean (SD) age of 60.3 (7.6) years. For the 152 patients with 6-month follow-up (75 patients in PnR [85%] and 77 patients in PPV [88%]), there was evidence for an association of PnR with superior vision-related functioning compared with PPV for several subscales. There were no differences between groups at 1 year. After adjusting for age, sex, baseline macular status, visual acuity in the nonstudy eye, and lens status, patients who underwent PnR had higher scores for distance activities (mean [SD] PnR, 88.7 [13.4]; PPV, 82.8 [17.1]; adjusted difference, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.6-11.4; P = .01), mental health (mean [SD] PnR, 84.3 [17.4]; PPV, 78.7 [21.1]; adjusted difference, 6.7; 95% CI, 0.4-13; P = .04), dependency (mean [SD] PnR, 96.1 [10.1]; PPV, 91.1 [18.6]; adjusted difference, 5.7; 95% CI, 0.6-10.8; P = .03), and peripheral vision (mean [SD] PnR, 91.6 [16.2]; PPV, 81.2 [24.4]; adjusted difference, 10.8; 95% CI, 4.3-17.4; P = .001) at 6 months. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings demonstrate that patients undergoing PnR for RRD report higher mental health scores and superior vision-related functioning scores in several subscales of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire during the first 6 months postoperatively compared with PPV. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01639209.

Indexed as

CryotherapyVitrectomyAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodQuality of LifeRetinal DetachmentRetinal PerforationsRetrospective StudiesSickness Impact ProfileSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32556156
PMCPMC7303897
OpenAlexW3036846892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.