Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556076›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2020

Models to Assess the Association of a Semiquantitative Exposure With Outcomes.

John M Lachin, Ionut Bebu, Barbara Braffett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John M Lachin
Ionut Bebu
Barbara Braffett

Funding

Limited Competition for the Continuation of Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Clinical Research Center (Collaborative U01)U01DK094157 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Ionut Bebu, Barbara Halina Braffett · 2011 to 2026
$97.6M
Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Data Coordinating CenterU01DK094176 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BEBU, IONUT, BRAFFETT, BARBARA HALINA · 2012 to 2022
$30.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094157NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A semiquantitative risk factor has 2 components: any exposure (yes/no) and the quantitative amount of exposure (if exposed). We describe the statistical properties of alternative analyses with such a risk factor using linear, logistic, or Cox proportional hazards models. Often analyses employ the amount exposed as a single quantitative covariate, including the nonexposed with value zero. However, this analysis provides a biased estimate of the exposure coefficient (slope) and we describe the magnitude of the bias. This bias can be eliminated by adding a binary covariate for exposed versus not to the model. This 2-factor analysis captures the full risk-factor effect on the outcome. However, the coefficient for any exposure versus not does not have a meaningful interpretation. Alternatively, when exposure values among those exposed are centered (by subtracting the mean), the estimate of this coefficient represents the difference in the outcome between those exposed versus not in aggregate. We also show that the biased model provides biased estimates of the coefficients for other covariates added to the model. Proper analysis of a semiquantitative risk factor should start with a 2-factor model, with centering, to assess the joint contributions of the 2 components of the risk-factor exposure. Properties of models were illustrated using data from a multisite study in North America (1983-2019).

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureModels, StatisticalHumansmodeling exposuresemiquantitative covariatesmoking and smoking intensityvariable with spike at zero

Identifiers

PMID32556076
PMCPMC7705609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.