Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32556071›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2020

Association Between Genotype and Phenotype in Consecutive Unrelated Individuals With Retinoblastoma.

Flore Salviat, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Matthieu Carton, Nathalie Cassoux, Livia Lumbroso-Le Rouic, Catherine Dehainault, Christine Levy, Lisa Golmard, Isabelle Aerts, François Doz and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Flore SalviatDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Saint-Cloud, France.
Marion Gauthier-VillarsDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Genetics, Paris, France.
Matthieu CartonDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Saint-Cloud, France.
Nathalie CassouxFaculty of Medicine Paris-Descartes, Paris University, Paris, France.
Livia Lumbroso-Le RouicService of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Catherine DehainaultDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Genetics, Paris, France.
Christine LevyService of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Lisa GolmardDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Genetics, Paris, France.
Isabelle AertsOncology Center, Soins, Innovation, Recherche en Oncologie de l'Enfant, l'Adolescent et du Jeune Adulte, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
François DozFaculty of Medicine Paris-Descartes, Paris University, Paris, France.
Fidéline Bonnet-SerranoDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Genetics, Paris, France.
Stéphanie HayekDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Genetics, Paris, France.
Alexia SavignoniDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Saint-Cloud, France.
Dominique Stoppa-LyonnetDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Genetics, Paris, France.
Claude HoudayerDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Genetics, Paris, France.
Institut Curie · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common pediatric intraocular neoplasm. RB is a complex model in which atypical pathogenic variants, modifier genes, imprinting, and mosaicism are known to be associated with the phenotype. In-depth understanding of RB therefore requires large genotype-phenotype studies. Objective: To assess the association between genotype and phenotype in patients with RB. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, retrospective cohort study, conducted from January 1, 2000, to September 30, 2017, enrolled 1404 consecutive ascertained patients with RB who consulted an oncogeneticist. All patients had their genotype and phenotype recorded. Statistical analysis was performed from July 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: RB1 germline and somatic pathogenic variant types, family history, and disease presentation characteristics (ie, age at diagnosis, sex, laterality, and International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification group). Results: Among 1404 patients with RB (734 [52.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 20.2 [21.2] months), 866 cases (61.7%) were unilateral and 538 cases (38.3%) were bilateral. Loss of function variants were found throughout the coding sequence, with 259 of 272 (95.2%) somatic pathogenic variants and 537 of 606 (88.6%) germline pathogenic variants (difference, 6.6%; 95% CI, 4.0%-9.2%; P < .001) after excluding tumor-specific pathogenic variants (ie, promoter methylation and loss of heterozygosity); a novel low-penetrance region was identified in exon 24. Compared with germline pathogenic variants estimated to retain RB protein expression, germline pathogenic variants estimated to abrogate RB protein expression were associated with an earlier mean (SD) age at diagnosis (12.3 [11.3] months among 457 patients vs 16.3 [13.2] months among 55 patients; difference, 4 months; 95% CI, 1.9-6.1 months; P = .01), more frequent bilateral involvement (84.2% among 452 patients vs 65.2% among 45 patients; difference, 18.9%; 95% CI, 14.5%-23.3%; P < .001), and more advanced International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification group (85.3% among 339 patients vs 73.9% among 34 patients; difference: 11.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-16.3%; P = .047). Among the 765 nongermline carriers of an RB1 pathogenic variant, most were female (419 females [54.8%] vs 346 males [45.2%]; P = .008), and males were more likely to have bilateral RB (23 males [71.4%] vs 12 females [34.3%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that RB risk is associated with the germline pathogenic variant and with maintenance of RB protein and that there is a sex-linked mechanism for nongermline carriers.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePenetranceRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaDNA, NeoplasmRB1 protein, humanRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID32556071
PMCPMC7303903
OpenAlexW3036358327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.