Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555948›Full record

Observational studyClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2020

Preliminary results of a clinical study to evaluate the performance and safety of swallowing in critical patients with COVID-19.

Maíra Santilli de Lima, Fernanda Chiarion Sassi, Gisele C Medeiros, Ana Paula Ritto, Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Clinical profile and recovery pattern of dysphagia in the COVID-19 patient: A prospective observational cohort within NSW.Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2023
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Swallowing Function in COVID-19 Patients After Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maíra Santilli de LimaDivisao de Fonoaudiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-3225-3083
Fernanda Chiarion SassiDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-6280
Gisele C MedeirosDivisao de Fonoaudiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-7083-106X
Ana Paula RittoDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-0528
Claudia Regina Furquim de AndradeDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-6377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAdultAgedAge FactorsAirway ExtubationCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Critical IllnessDeglutition DisordersFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedPandemics

Identifiers

PMID32555948
PMCPMC7279627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.