Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555939›Full record

Trial reportActa cirurgica brasileira2020

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the analgesic effect of intraoperative esmolol for laparoscopic gastroplasty.

Vinicius Barros Duarte de Morais, Rioko Kimiko Sakata, Ana Paula Santana Huang, Leonardo Henrique da Cunha Ferraro

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06268275 (Comparison of Effects of Scalp Block and Intravenous Esmolol on Hemodynamic Response Following the Skull Pins Application for Elective Supratentorial Craniotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06268275 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Effects of Scalp Block and Intravenous Esmolol on Hemodynamic Response Following the Skull Pins Application for Elective Supratentorial Craniotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhon Kaen UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsHemodynamic InstabilityArmsScalp block, Esmolol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Comparison of the effects of perioperative intravenous infusions of esmolol and lidocaine on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vinicius Barros Duarte de MoraisMD, Pain Sector, Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil, Design of the study, acquisition of data, final approval.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5309-5582
Rioko Kimiko SakataPhD, Pain Sector, Department of Surgery, UNIFESP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil, Design of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision, final approval.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-1746
Ana Paula Santana HuangMaster, Pain Sector, Department of Surgery, UNIFESP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Acquisition of data, final approval.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-836X
Leonardo Henrique da Cunha FerraroPhD, Pain Sector, Department of Surgery, UNIFESP, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Manuscript writing, final approval.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5389-8796
Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the analgesic effect of esmolol in patients submitted to laparoscopic gastroplasty.

methodsForty patients aged between 18 and 50 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores of II and III who underwent gastric bypass were allocated to two groups. Group 1 patients received a 0.5-mg/kg bolus of esmolol in 30 mL of saline before induction of anesthesia, followed by an infusion at 15 µg/kg/min until the end of surgery. Group 2 patients received 30 mL of saline as a bolus and then an infusion of saline. Anesthesia included fentanyl (3 µg/kg), propofol (2-4 mg/kg), rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), and 2% sevoflurane, with remifentanil if necessary. The following parameters were evaluated: pain intensity over 24h, remifentanil consumption, the first analgesic request, morphine consumption, and side effects.

resultsPain intensity was lower in the esmolol group except at T0 (after extubation) and 12h postoperatively. Remifentanil supplementation, recovery time, and postoperative morphine supplementation were lower in the esmolol group. No differences in the time to the first analgesic request or side effects were found between the groups.

conclusionIntraoperative esmolol promotes reductions in pain intensity and the need for analgesic supplementation without adverse effects, thus representing an effective drug for multimodal analgesia in gastroplasty.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdultAnalgesiaAnesthesiaAnestheticsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastroplastyHumansIntraoperative PeriodLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAnestheticsesmololPropanolamines

Identifiers

PMID32555939
PMCPMC7357839
OpenAlexW3034489528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.