Trial reportCardiovascular journal of Africa
Short-term efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.
Trial report in Cardiovascular journal of Africa. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Efficacy and Safety of Levosimendan in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of levosimendan on ventricular remodelling in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of levosimendan on right ventricular function in patients with heart dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- The possible impact of levosimendan infusions on clinical course of heart failure: the results of the LEIA-HF study.ESC heart failure · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to investigate and evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Forty-nine patients with chronic systolic heart failure during acute decompensation were randomly divided into a levosimendan group (26 cases) and a control group (23 cases). The control group received only routine treatment, while the levosimendan group received a levosimendan bolus with a load of 12 µg/kg, in addition to the same routine treatment as the control group. After 48 hours of treatment, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in the levosimendan group were significantly lower than those in the control group. In addition, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function scores of the levosimendan group were significantly higher and more improved than those of the control group seven days after treatment, but there was no significant difference in the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter between the two groups. Furthermore, 48 hours after treatment, there were no significant differences in potassium, haemoglobin, haematocrit and creatinine levels between the levosimendan and control groups. During the whole hospitalisation, there was one case of sudden death in the control group and one case of palpitations in the levosimendan group, and no hypotension or severe hypokalaemia occurred in either group. Levosimendan significantly improved NT-proBNP and LVEF in patients with chronic systolic heart failure, and improved NYHA cardiac function classification without significant cardiovascular events. Levosimendan is therefore effective and safe in the short-term treatment of chronic systolic heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.