ArticlePloS one2020
Field-based screening of selected oral antibiotics in Belize.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- When First-Line Therapies Fail: Surgical Site Infections and the Declining Antimicrobial Utility in a Resource-Limited Nation.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Evaluating Antibiotic Resistance in Urban Rivers and Coral Reefs of Belize: Evidence for Hotspots and a Potential Screening Tool.GeoHealth · 2026Article
- Preparing the Frontline: Profiling Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Gaps in Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Among Future Health Professionals in Belize.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Diabetic Foot Infections in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (1980-2025).International journal of microbiology · 2026Review
- Preparation of fungal biocomposite for environment friendly packaging of plant saplings.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Quality evaluation of cephalexin, cefuroxime, and ceftriaxone medicines marketed in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia with three tier level approach and anti-microbial assays.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Treatment gaps and risk factors for multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales in Belize: a 6-year (2018-2023) nationwide retrospective analysis.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
- Beyond the epidemic curve: a critical systematic review of the structural, ecological, and viral determinants sustaining Chikungunya and Zika viruses in Latin America and the Caribbean.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
- Author response to comment on: Treatment gaps and risk factors for multidrug-resistant enterobacterales in Belize: A 6-year (2018-2023) nationwide retrospective analysis.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe presence of poor quality antibiotics on the market has contributed to the antibiotics resistance and global threat to public health. Antibiotic resistance is now a global concern. One area to address this issue is by evaluating the quality of antibiotics accessible to the public. The purpose of this study was to test and compare (with corresponding pharmacopeia) the quality of common oral antibiotics available in the country of Belize with a view to providing base-line data on the testing of medications imported to the country for public consumption. The study focused only on level 2 field-based screening quality assurance on three Key Access Antibiotics from the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines.
methodsFive brands of antibiotic tablets/capsules with denoted pharmacopeia imported into the country of Belize were tested for quality at The University of Belize pharmacy laboratory. A sample of 30 tablets/capsules each of the selected antibiotic brand were used for study. Visual inspection and weight variation were done for each sample while Monsanto type tablet hardness tester, Roche@Tablet Friability Test Apparatus (single drum), and Ajanta@ Tablet Disintegration Test Apparatus (double basket) were conducted on selected antibiotics. Results were recorded and compared with corresponding pharmacopoeia references.
resultsMost of the samples collected passed performed tests. Only a few samples from both BP and USP antibiotics failed in visual inspection and weight variation tests. All antibiotics tested conformed to their corresponding pharmacopeia reference in terms of friability and disintegration time.
conclusionMost of the selected antibiotics passed performed tests when compared with their pharmacopeia. Only a few samples from both BP and USP antibiotics failed the tests conducted. There is need for regular quality assurance tests on all medications imported to Belize especially antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.