Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555668›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Sex-dependent effects of chronic intermittent voluntary alcohol consumption on attentional, not motivational, measures during probabilistic learning and reversal.

Claudia G Aguirre, Alexandra Stolyarova, Kanak Das, Saisriya Kolli, Vincent Marty, Lara Ray, Igor Spigelman, Alicia Izquierdo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia G AguirreDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Alexandra StolyarovaDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Kanak DasDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Saisriya KolliDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Vincent MartyThe Brain Research Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Lara RayDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Igor SpigelmanThe Brain Research Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Alicia IzquierdoDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9897-2091

Funding

CRCNS Research Proposal: Cortico-amygdalar substrates of adaptive learningR01DA047870 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Alicia Izquierdo, Alireza Soltani · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
Synaptic mechanisms of HPA axis dysregulation in alcohol dependenceR01AA024527 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SPIGELMAN, IGOR · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024527NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForced alcohol (ethanol, EtOH) exposure has been shown to cause significant impairments on reversal learning, a widely-used assay of cognitive flexibility, specifically on fully-predictive, deterministic versions of this task. However, previous studies have not adequately considered voluntary EtOH consumption and sex effects on probabilistic reversal learning. The present study aimed to fill this gap in the literature.

methodsMale and female Long-Evans rats underwent either 10 weeks of voluntary intermittent 20% EtOH access or water only (H2O) access. Rats were then pretrained to initiate trials and learn stimulus-reward associations via touchscreen response, and subsequently required to select between two visual stimuli, rewarded with probability 0.70 or 0.30. In the final phase, reinforcement contingencies were reversed.

resultsWe found significant sex differences on several EtOH-drinking variables, with females reaching a higher maximum EtOH consumption, exhibiting more high-drinking days, and escalating their EtOH at a quicker rate compared to males. During early abstinence, EtOH drinkers (and particularly EtOH-drinking females) made more initiation omissions and were slower to initiate trials than H2O drinking controls, especially during pretraining. A similar pattern in trial initiations was also observed in discrimination, but not in reversal learning. EtOH drinking rats were unaffected in their reward collection and stimulus response times, indicating intact motivation and motor responding. Although there were sex differences in discrimination and reversal phases, performance improved over time. We also observed sex-independent drinking group differences in win-stay and lose-shift strategies specific to the reversal phase.

conclusionsFemales exhibit increased vulnerability to EtOH effects in early learning: there were sex-dependent EtOH effects on attentional measures during pretraining and discrimination phases. We also found sex-independent EtOH effects on exploration strategies during reversal. Future studies should aim to uncover the neural mechanisms for changes in attention and exploration in both acute and prolonged EtOH withdrawal.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAnimalsChoice BehaviorFemaleMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansReversal LearningRewardSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID32555668
PMCPMC7302450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.