Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555667›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Treatment of stimulant use disorder: A systematic review of reviews.

Claire Ronsley, Seonaid Nolan, Rod Knight, Kanna Hayashi, Jano Klimas, Alex Walley, Evan Wood, Nadia Fairbairn

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 125 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06073340 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Observational Longitudinal Study of Individuals With Stimulant Use Disorder: Research and Development of a Biosignature

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsStimulant Use, Stimulant-Related Disorder, Healthy
NCT06532370 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementing a Contingency Management Program Addressing Methamphetamine Use For and With the People of Hawaii

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's Medical CenterRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsContingency Managment, Methamphetamine Use DisorderArmsContingency Managment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The use ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  16. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Stimulant-Related Emergencies.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Determinants of the willingness to reduce or quit cocaine use among nightlife attendees.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire RonsleyBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Seonaid NolanBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9473-7190
Rod KnightBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kanna HayashiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jano KlimasBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alex WalleyDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Evan WoodBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nadia FairbairnBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4195-3284
University of British Columbia · CABoston University · USSimon Fraser University · CAUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Mentoring the next generation of addiction clinician scientists while responding to the opioid epidemicR25DA037756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI FAIRBAIRN, NADIA · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
CIHR 422332CIHR 671 397968CIHR MSH-141971NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA037756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsStimulant use disorder contributes to a substantial worldwide burden of disease, although evidence-based treatment options are limited. This systematic review of reviews aims to: (i) synthesize the available evidence on both psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of stimulant use disorder; (ii) identify the most effective therapies to guide clinical practice, and (iii) highlight gaps for future study.

methodsA systematic database search was conducted to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Eligible studies were those that followed standard systematic review methodology and assessed randomized controlled trials focused on the efficacy of interventions for stimulant use disorder. Articles were critically appraised using an assessment tool adapted from Palmeteer et al. and categorized for quality as 'core' or 'supplementary' reviews. Evidence from the included reviews were further synthesized according to pharmacological or non-pharmacological management themes.

resultsOf 476 identified records, 29 systematic reviews examining eleven intervention modalities were included. The interventions identified include: contingency management, cognitive behavioural therapy, acupuncture, antidepressants, dopamine agonists, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, disulfiram, opioid agonists, N-Acetylcysteine, and psychostimulants. There was sufficient evidence to support the efficacy of contingency management programs for treatment of stimulant use disorder. Psychostimulants, n-acetylcysteine, opioid agonist therapy, disulfiram and antidepressant pharmacological interventions were found to have insufficient evidence to support or discount their use. Results of this review do not support the use of all other treatment options.

conclusionsThe results of this review supports the use of contingency management interventions for the treatment of stimulant use disorder. Although evidence to date is insufficient to support the clinical use of psychostimulants, our results demonstrate potential for future research in this area. Given the urgent need for effective pharmacological treatments for stimulant use disorder, high-quality primary research focused on the role of psychostimulant medications for the treatment of stimulant use disorder is needed.

Indexed as

AcupunctureAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCentral Nervous System StimulantsCognitive Behavioral TherapyDopamine AgonistsHumansSubstance-Related DisordersAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamine Agonists

Identifiers

PMID32555667
PMCPMC7302911
OpenAlexW3036747176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.