Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555649›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Application of network analysis and cluster analysis for better prevention and control of swine diseases in Argentina.

Jerome N Baron, Maria N Aznar, Mariela Monterubbianesi, Beatriz Martínez-López

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jerome N BaronDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Animal Disease Modeling and Surveillance (CADMS), University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9036-1218
Maria N AznarInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariela MonterubbianesiServicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria de la Republica Argentina (SENASA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Beatriz Martínez-LópezDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Animal Disease Modeling and Surveillance (CADMS), University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USNational Agricultural Technology Institute · ARNational Food Safety and Quality Service · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE/

backgroundThough much smaller than the bovine industry, the porcine sector in Argentina involves a large number of farms and represents a significant economic sector. In recent years Argentina has implemented a national registry of swine movements amongst other measures, in an effort to control and eventually eradicate endemic Aujesky's disease. Such information can prove valuable in assessing the risk of transmission between farms for endemic diseases but also for other diseases at risk of emergence.

methodsShipment data from 2011 to 2016 were analyzed in an effort to define strategic locations and times at which control and surveillance efforts should be focused to provide cost-effective interventions. Social network analysis (SNA) was used to characterize the network as a whole and at the individual farm and market level to help identify important nodes. Spatio-temporal trends of pig movements were also analyzed. Finally, in an attempt to classify farms and markets in different groups based on their SNA metrics, we used factor analysis for mixed data (FAMD) and hierarchical clustering.

resultsThe network involved approximate 136,000 shipments for a total of 6 million pigs. Over 350 markets and 17,800 production units participated in shipments with another 83,500 not participating. Temporal data of shipments and network metrics showed peaks in shipments in September and October. Most shipments where within provinces, with Buenos Aires, Cordoba and Santa Fe concentrating 61% of shipments. Network analysis showed that markets are involved in relatively few shipments but hold strategic positions with much higher betweenness compared to farms. Hierarchical clustering yielded four groups based on SNA metrics and node characteristics which can be broadly described as: 1. small and backyard farms; 2. industrial farms; 3. markets; and 4. a single outlying market with extreme centrality values.

conclusionCharacterizing the network structure and spatio-temporal characteristics of Argentine swine shipments provides valuable information that can guide targeted and more cost-effective surveillance and control programs. We located key nodes where efforts should be prioritized. Pig network characteristics and patterns can be used to create dynamic disease transmission models, which can both be used in assessing the impact of emerging diseases and guiding efforts to eradicate endemic ones.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsArgentinaCluster AnalysisFarmsPseudorabiesRisk FactorsSpatio-Temporal AnalysisSwineSwine DiseasesTransportation

Identifiers

PMID32555649
PMCPMC7299388
OpenAlexW3035857330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.