Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555639›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Seasonal and annual fluctuations of deer populations estimated by a Bayesian state-space model.

Inoue Mizuki, Hiroki Itô, Michimasa Yamasaki, Shigeru Fukumoto, Yuuki Okamoto, Masaya Katsuki, Keitaro Fukushima, Masaru Sakai, Shota Sakaguchi, Daisuke Fujiki and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Inoue MizukiDepartment of Biosciences, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7390-3655
Hiroki ItôHokkaido Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-1007
Michimasa YamasakiLaboratory of Forest Biology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shigeru FukumotoGeneral Office in Hirano-cho, Osaka, Japan.
Yuuki OkamotoDepartment of Biosciences, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaya KatsukiDepartment of Biosciences, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keitaro FukushimaCenter for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5968-5938
Masaru SakaiFukushima Branch, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan.
Shota SakaguchiGraduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Daisuke FujikiInstitute of Natural and Environment Sciences, University of Hyogo, Sanda, Hyogo, Japan.
Hikaru NakagawaCenter for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masae Iwamoto IshiharaField Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi TakayanagiLaboratory of Forest Biology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deer overabundance is a contributing factor in the degradation of plant communities and ecosystems worldwide. The management and conservation of the deer-affected ecosystems requires us to urgently grasp deer population trends and to identify the factors that affect them. In this study, we developed a Bayesian state-space model to estimate the population dynamics of sika deer (Cervus nippon) in a cool-temperate forest in Japan, where wolves (Canis lupus hodophilax) are extinct. The model was based on field data collected from block count surveys, road count surveys by vehicles, mortality surveys during the winter, and nuisance control for 12 years (2007-2018). We clarified the seasonal and annual fluctuation of the deer population. We found a peak of deer abundance (2010) over 12 years. In 2011 the estimated deer abundance decreased drastically and has remained at a low level then. The deer abundance gradually increased from April to December during 2013-2018. The seasonal fluctuation we detected could reflect the seasonal migration pattern of deer and the population recruitment through fawn births in early summer. In our model, snowfall accumulation, which can be a lethal factor for deer, may have slightly affected their mortality during the winter. Although we could not detect a direct effect of snow on population dynamics, snowfall decrease due to global warming may decelerate the winter migration of deer; subsequently, deer staying on-site may intensively forage evergreen perennial plants during the winter season. The nuisance control affected population dynamics. Even in wildlife protection areas and national parks where hunting is regulated, nuisance control could be effective in buffering the effect of deer browsing on forest ecosystems.

Indexed as

DeerModels, StatisticalSeasonsAnimalsBayes TheoremPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID32555639
PMCPMC7302714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.