Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32555629›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Marked variability in bioactivity between commercially available bovine colostrum for human use; implications for clinical trials.

Raymond J Playford, Meg Cattell, Tania Marchbank

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Feeding aAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raymond J PlayfordCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-8504
Meg CattellDepartment of Research & Development, Pantheryx Inc, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Tania MarchbankCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, London, England, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColostrum, the milk produced during first few days after birth, is rich in immunoglobulins, antimicrobial peptides & growth factors. Multiple clinical trials using bovine colostrum are ongoing but with no assessment of test product bioactivity.

objectivesTo examine variability of bioactivity between 20 commercial colostrum products, contribution of TGFβ and EGFR in mediating effects, heat sensitivity of bioactivity and changes in bioactivity of colostrum milkings in the days following calving.

designIn vitro bioactivity used AGS, RIE-1 and Caco-2 cell proliferation (Alamar blue) and migration (wounded monolayers) assays. Changes in colostrum bioactivity determined following addition of TGFβ-neutralising antibody, EGFR blocker (Typhostin) and after heating (40-60°C, 60 min). In vivo bioassay assessed ability of colostrum gavage (2ml, 7mg/ml) to reduce gastric damage (NSAID + restraint) in rats. Milkings from 6 cows, days 0-3 post calving were assessed for bioactivity and growth factor concentrations.

resultSix-fold differences in pro-proliferative and migratory activity were seen comparing commercial products. Comparison of most- and least-active samples from in vitro studies showed two- to three-fold differences in ability to reduce gastric injury (86% reduction using most-active vs 48% using least-active, p<0.01). Tyrphostin reduced pro-migratory and proliferative activity by 23% and 55%. TGFβ neutralisation reduced migratory activity by 83% but did not affect proliferation Heating colostrum powder to 50°C did not affect immunoactivity of haptoglobin, EGF, TGFβ, IgG, IGF-1 or betacellulin but decreased bioactivity by >40%. Milking studies showed high bioactivity during first and second milkings on day 0 but 77% reduction by day 3. Changes in total protein, haptoglobin, EGF, TGFβ, IgG and IGF-1 paralleled falls in bioactivity.

conclusionCommercial colostrum products possess widely different bioactivity. Variation in heat exposure and/or proportion of day 0 colostrum content may contribute to this. Assessment of colostrum bioactivity has advantages to growth factor quantitation for quality control.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAgedAnimalsCaco-2 CellsCattleCell MovementCell ProliferationColostrumErbB ReceptorsFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMalePregnancyTransforming Growth Factor betaErbB ReceptorsTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID32555629
PMCPMC7299325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.