ArticlePloS one2020
Gender differences in quality of life in coronary artery disease patients with comorbidities undergoing coronary revascularization.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiology- versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for people with coronary artery disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Quality of Life After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Treating Women With Calcified Coronary Arteries Using Intravascular Lithotripsy: Primary Results of the EMPOWER CAD Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Differences in the Incidence of Hypotension and Hypertension between Sexes during Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Differential associations of sex and age with changes in HRQoL during outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Article
- Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Sex differences in quality of life of patients following percutaneous coronary intervention in Vietnam.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Assessment of utility values and QALYs after primary PCI with DP-Xience and BP-Biomatrix stents.PloS one · 2021Observational
- Life After the Stent or the Scalpel: Comparative Study of Quality of Life after 1 year following Coronary Revascularization.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In comparison to male patients with coronary artery disease, female patients suffer from more comorbidities, experience symptoms of coronary artery disease differently and report poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after coronary revascularization. However, there is limited data on the impact of comorbidity burden on the recovery in HRQoL in female and male patients. We investigated the impact of comorbidity burden on the change in HRQoL following coronary revascularization in female patients versus male patients. 230 patients (60 female) with coronary artery disease were assessed before, and two weeks, three months and six months after coronary revascularization. Disease-specific HRQoL was measured with the Short-Form Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Physical and mental health was measured with the Short-Form Health Survey. Comorbidity burden was assessed by the total number of identified comorbidity conditions and by the Charlson comorbidity score. Linear mixed models were used to estimate the effects of time, gender and comorbidity burden on HRQoL. Whereas HRQoL improved after coronary revascularization in all patients, female patients reported poorer physical health and disease-specific HRQoL and their physical health improved more slowly than male patients. A higher comorbidity burden was related with poorer physical health and disease-specific HRQoL in male patients, but not in female patients. A higher comorbidity burden was associated with slower improvement in HRQoL for both female and male patients. Female patients reported poorer HRQoL and their physical health improved more slowly after coronary revascularization, irrespective of comorbidity burden. Higher comorbidity burden was associated with poorer physical health and disease-specific HRQoL in male patients only. Our results indicate that female and male patients recover differently after coronary revascularization. These findings highlight the importance of comorbidity- and gender-specific approaches for evaluating coronary artery disease and coronary revascularization procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.